Why Was My Article Rejected

 I enjoy and maintain three composition directories. One is a general directory and two are niche directories. Every day I admit hundreds of composition cessions, and every day I reject dozens. When I first started, I would precisely include a specific reason for each rejection, but now cessions are so high it's I can do to keep my head above water. Honestly, I feel it's more important to try to turn papers around in as timely a fashion as possible, so I'm all about speed now (and am still weeks behind with my general directory). Still, I can partake these tips in an open letter to composition marketers who don't understand why their papers are rejected by my directories — and likely other composition directories as well. The primary reasons papers are rejected by me include Reason 1 Active links in the body of the composition. The only place I want to see an active link is the author resource box. This is fairly standard with utmost composition directories. Reason 2 The composition doesn't belong in this directory. Generally, this is true of a large chance of my niche directory rejections. If the directory is about Internet creation, don't submit your papers about bone addition! Reason 3 The composition wasn't submitted in the right order. If I'm in a nice mood, or I'm really interested in the composition also, I might recategorize it. If I fête an author who regularly delivers quality content, I might recategorize it. If it's in the right broad order, I might move it to a more specific subcategory. Still, if it was submitted with no apparent study or trouble also I'll most probably reject it. If the author can't be bothered to select the right order also, why should I take the time? Reason 4 Substandard English. If there are typos or poor alphabet in the caption or summary also, I'm not impressed and will most probably reject the submission. Reason 5 Subject spamming. If I admit a number of papers on the same subject and by the same author with analogous titles and summaries also, I'll suspect composition spamming. Rather than sort out which papers might offer quality unique content, I simply reject them all. Reason 6 Obscure motifs. If I don't suppose that your composition about New Jersey Divorce Attorneys will really add anything to my directory also I might just choose to reject it. Also, if I can't tell what your composition is about from the title, summary, or first paragraphs also I'm not going to read any further. Reason 7 Blatant advertising. These are composition directories, so I don't want press releases or straight announcements. Papers should include information about a commodity other than whatever business you're trying to promote. The simple fact is that these are my directories, so I use my own editorial judgment about the applicable content. I use the feeds and papers from my directories on my web spots and in my blogs, and my nethermost line is that the composition should offer intriguing and/ or appealing information to the target followership. If it isn't a composition I want to see on my point also choose to reject it.