Why Should the West Give Putin Security Guarantees?

37 Hits - Aslam minhas - Jan 6, 2023, 1:50 AM

Last Month, French President Emmanuel

Macron Hit The Headlines When He

Suggested That The West Should Provide

Russia With Quote Security Guarantees In

The Event Of A Negotiated Settlement

Over Ukraine, Which Would Basically

Involve Promising Putin Not To Expand

NATO, Further Eastwards Or Deploy Weapons

Or Troops Near Russia's Territory

Unsurprisingly Macron's Comments

Provokes Outrage In Ukraine, Alex,

Daniel, Secretary Of The Ukrainian

National Security And Defense Council

Described Macron's Ideas As Carpet

Diplomacy While Mikhail Padolyak, One Of

Heli-ski's Main Advisors Suggested That

The World Should Instead Be Seeking

Security Guarantees From Russia

Nonetheless, This Isn't An Unprecedented

The Idea of The US, Provided Japan With

Security Guarantees Of A Sort In The

The Aftermath Of World War I With 1960

Treaty Of Mutual Cooperation And

Security That Required US, Forces

Stationed In Japan To Defend Japan In

The Event Of A Foreign Invasion And More

Recently German Chancellor Olaf Schultz

Alluded To Something Similar, Only A Few

Days Before When He Suggested That

Europe Should Return To The Pre-war

Peace Order With Russia And Resolve

Quote All Common Security Issues So In

This Video, We Thought We'd Try This And

Figure Out In The Event Of A Negotiated

Settlement Of What The Pros And Cons Are

For The West To Provide Security

Guarantees To Russia

As We See It, There Were Three

Arguments Against Providing Security

Guarantees To Russia

The First Is A Kind Of Moral Argument

That Putin And The Kremlin Don't Deserve

To Incur Any Kind Of Benefit From Their

Invasion

The Second Is A Deterrent Argument That

Granting Concessions To Russia Will Only

Encourage Putin And Other Dictators To

Engage In Further Wars Of Aggression In

The Future

The Third Argument Is That Providing The

Kremlin With NATO, Related Security

Guarantees Would Be To Tacitly Endorse

Putin's Spheres Of Influence Narrative

Which Claims That Russia Was Provoked

Into Invading Ukraine Through NATO, Eastwards,

Expansion Into Russia's Sphere Of

An Influence That Is Well Dubious At Best

Let's Start With The Moral Argument

Which Is The One Ukrainian Officials

Usually, Appeal To Them When They're Resisting

Macron's Dovish Suggestions Largely

Because It's Probably The Most

The Politically Powerful Argument This Is

What Danilo, Is Doing When He Invokes

The Nuremberg Trials And Talks About The

Ukrainian Blood On Putin's Hands The

The Idea Here Is That If The West Provides

Russia With Security Guarantees Say By

Agreeing Not To Accept Ukraine Into NATO,

Or Deploying Certain Weapon Systems On

NATO, Members Bordering Russia Than Putin

Will Have Benefited In Some Way The

The Russian President Has Long Complained

About NATO's Eastwards, Expansion, And If

His Invasion Ends Up Guaranteeing

Against This Putin, Will Have Gained

Something From His Invasion

Many People, Especially Ukrainians

There's Something Morally Unpalatable

About Essentially Rewarding Putin For

Causing Untold Amounts Of Suffering,

across the European continent, the second

the argument is that rewarding Putin with this

the way will encourage Putin and other

ambitious neo-imperialists to Stage

similar Wars of Conquest in the future

if Putin feels he won something from

invading Ukraine this time what's to

stop him from doing it again, similarly if

someone like says Xi Jinping sees that

invading smaller neighbors pays

dividends, then they might be encouraged

to take a pot at Taiwan safe in the

the knowledge that even if the military

massively underperforms as the Russian

the military has in Ukraine, the West will

eventually, cave to your security demands

however unreasonable they may be and the

the third argument is about exactly that

Putin's fears of influence narrative

which motivates his concerns about

NATO-Related security guarantees claims

that Russia was provoked into invading

Ukraine by NATO's Eastwards, expansion

some people argue that providing Putin

with security, guarantees would amount to

tacitly endorsing his narrative despite

the fact that it's pretty dubious

while NATO has indeed expanded eastwards

since its inception in 1949, this isn't

so much because the Americans wanted to

encroach on Russia's spheres of

influence, but rather because many

European countries independently

expressed their intention to sign up to

the alliance, largely because it's proven

arguably the most successful defensive

military Alliance in history now whether

or not, you're sympathetic to Putin's

the narrative will depend on lots of things

including whether you're more of a

realist or a liberal and whether you

believe the Soviet or American account

of NATO's early history, but lots of

people argue that the West shouldn't

endorse such dubious narratives Not only

would this be in some sense disingenuous

after all, it would involve endorsing a

a narrative that most western politicians

take to be false for instrumental

reasons but the International Community

also has an interest in maintaining a

high bar when it comes to justifications

for war and tacitly accepting Putin's

fears of influence justification won't

help so those are the arguments against

providing security guarantees to Putin

what about the arguments in favor of

doing so well as we see it there were

two main arguments in favor of providing

Putin with security guarantees first it

might make a successful peace

negotiation more likely and second it

might make any piece more likely to hold

in the future, let's start with the first

one that it'll make a peace settlement

more likely essentially some people

usually, self-described realists argue

that any peace settlement will

ultimately require concessions by both

sides and that as a form of concession

security guarantees open the door for a

successful peace settlement

if you accept this line of reasoning and

that a peace settlement is indeed a good

the idea of offering security guarantees

make sense now most Ukrainians don't buy,

This Argument Both Because They Consider

Calls For Peace Are Premature Given The

State Of Affairs On The Battlefield And

Because They Consider Conditions On

Ukraine's Relationship With Nato An

Unacceptably High Price For Peace But

This Is Presumably What Macron Was

Thinking About Early December The

The Second Argument Is That Security

Guarantees Make A Peace Settlement More

Likely To Survive Essentially Some

People Including More Dovish Western

Politicians Worry That If Putin Fails To

Extract The Security Guarantees Then His

Continuing Anxieties About NATO,

Enlargement And The Political Pressure

On Him, Will Make A Renewal Of Violence

More Likely In The Future On The Other

Hand If The West Agrees Not To Expand

NATO, Further Or Maybe Restrict

Deployments On NATO's Eastern Flank

Putin Might Feel Less Threatened And So

Be Less Likely To Restart The Conflict

Again, We Should Say That Kyiv Doesn't

Accept This Line Of Reasoning And Both

Danilo And Have Argued That In

Reality Security Guarantees For Ukraine

And Perhaps Russia's Demilitarization

Would Be A Better Way To Stabilize The

Conflict, But Macron Presumably Thinks

That Is As Long As Russia's Total

Demilitarization Looks Unlikely in A Stable

Peace Will Instead Require A Settlement

Acceptable To Moscow, So Those Are The

Arguments For And Against Providing

Russia With Security Guarantees In

Keeping With Our Neutrality, We're Not

Going To Take A Side On The Issue, But We

Nonetheless., Hope You Found This Video

Interesting And Informative Also We'd

Love To Hear Your Thoughts On This Topic

And The Current State Of Russia

Ukraine Crisis More Generally Obviously

We've Just Entered A New Year And With

The Conflict Still Rumbling On Its Only

Natural That New Questions Are Being

Raised Rightly Or Wrongly So In The

Comments Below Are Sure To Tell Us What

You Think About The Current Status Quo

And How You Expect It To Evolve As We

Head Through 2023 Also If You Like These

Kinds Of Videos And You Want More

Updates On The War In Ukraine As Well As

European News More Generally Than Be

Sure To Subscribe To The Channel And

Ring The Bell To Ensure You Never Miss A

Think And If You Really Like Our Stuff

Be Sure To Check Out Our Sister Channels

Including Relative Newbies To Daily

And Tldr Business