why Early detection of cancer

When cancer is detected at the earliest stages, treatment is more effective and survival drastically improves. Yet ~50% of cancers are still only detected at an advanced stage. Improved earlier detection of cancer could substantially increase survival rates. Although recent advances in early detection have saved lives, further innovations and development of early cancer detection approaches are needed. The field is evolving rapidly, owing to advances in biological understanding and an increasing pace of technological progress.

ADVANCES

We highlight five challenges facing the field, current work in those areas, and where more research is needed to make early detection a reality. The first challenge is to build a greater understanding of the biology and behavior of early disease. This will help identify ways to distinguish between consequential, aggressive lesions and inconsequential lesions that will not cause harm. Such insight will be crucial to realizing the potential for early detection to inform treatment decisions and improve survival, while minimizing the risk of overtreatment. Alongside studies in human samples, better models of disease are enabling identification of early signals of tumorigenesis and clarifying the contributions of the immune system and microenvironment to tumor development.Survival improves when cancer is detected early. However, ~50% of cancers are at an advanced stage when diagnosed. Early detection of cancer or precancerous change allows early intervention to try to slow or prevent cancer development and lethality. 
The second challenge is determining the risk of developing cancer. How can we use germline genomic susceptibility, family history, exposures, demographic, and behavioral data to build nuanced risk models to identify who should be tested for cancer and how test results should be interpreted and followed up? Progress is being made to address this challenge through improved understanding of the genomics of cancer risk, integration of that insight with other risk factors, and the development of large-scale population cohorts where risk models can be developed and validated.
The third challenge is finding and validating biomarkers of early cancer. There is considerable difficulty in finding accurate signals of early cancer (which usually exist in very small amounts) amid the noise of normal human physiology. Although progress has historically been slow, many promising early detection markers are emerging, including circulating tumor DNA, circulating tumor cells, proteins, exosomes, and cancer metabolites. Advances in data analysis methodologies (such as machine learning) and integration across marker types in multimodal tests are also accelerating progress.
The fourth challenge is technological. It involves both the iterative improvement of existing approaches and the development of disruptive detection technologies that can very sensitively and specifically identify early biological changes, whether in tissue structure, biochemistry, or function. Powerful molecular analytical technologies and advanced imaging and histopathological methods are increasing the ability to sensitively find earlier tumors, while the use of synthetic markers may help to amplify their signal.
The fifth challenge is how to appropriately evaluate early detection approaches. Translation of biological insights into new diagnostic technologies and execution of clinical trials to validate those advances require substantial time and money. We discuss ways in which that process might be improved.

Enjoyed this article? Stay informed by joining our newsletter!

Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment.

About Author