Blame On Food To Fail The Diet:
In accordance with Rob. Jagger This year, millions of people will start on a diet and fail to lose weight. A common response to this failure of food vendors is to blame someone for the failure. This leaves a person feeling overwhelmed and guilty because of a lack of “determination” to blame the person, and maintains the illusion that the diet you are eating is an effective way to lose weight.
I think it's time to throw it to her and move on. I will use a sample to illustrate the point. Many will simply blame the chocolate for causing the craving. They will then be trying to fight the urge for “power”. They are often defeated in this battle and eventually admit and eat a chocolate bar. This "devotion" often marks the end of a meal. Now let's look at why this "dedication" happened. We know that the process of thinking that caused the craving to eat chocolate went like this; the sensory input was detected by the appropriate receptors [especially the eyes in this case] and his brain was some kind of sensory or sensory representation of what would be described as a chocolate bar.
We can regard this process as inevitable. When sensory receptors function normally, the brain must develop a representation or neural image of an object. When a neural image is created, it has been taught to assign meanings, from memory, to these images as they occur in the brain. The sharing of meaning is followed by an emotional response to the assigned meaning. In the case of the chocolate bar, the assigned description includes memories of past "experiences" of eating chocolate bars, which is why you look forward to eating this chocolate bar.
So it was really not the existence of something that would be described as a chocolate bar that aroused curiosity, but the cognitive process that was described. And because this descriptive assignment is completely natural to most people, the chocolate bar finds a craving for cravings while actually having the power to make his mind a meaningless image. For many, the definition and image is “integrated”, and the definition now seen as a natural part of the neural image itself has something assigned within the mind. This gives the impetus the power to be the cause of the response.
Just thinking or meditating on a chocolate bar has a similar effect. The neural image is formed from the representation and when the cognitive process is given to interpret it automatically it resembles images caused by external motives. We feel like eating a chocolate bar. This all means that every time we are given a chocolate bar or other desirable food, the brain automatically performs the cognitive process described and creates the desire to eat sweets. Continuous emotional responses are constructive and ultimately irritating.
This is the reason we are "dedicated" and the food goes out the window. My point, then, is that the only way to reduce our food intake and feel free to change this process of automatically sharing the meaning to incoming images. In this way we can reduce the need for junk food and thus change the way we eat to lose weight and not do it. Diet does not provide these strategies and does not actually work for the individual and not the other way around as their suppliers would.
If changing our behavior was as easy as deciding to go for a meal, most of us would change a lot of things for ourselves long ago. The fact is that we need strategies that will help us to achieve that change, or we will fail.
You must be logged in to post a comment.