Why are German Social Democrats hesitant about tank deliveries to Ukraine?

Now We've Got An Ongoing Debate Whether

Or Not Western Allies Should Supply

Ukraine With Western-built Battle Tanks

Such As The Leopard What's Your Stance

Well I Think We Have A Debate about That Is

Only Focused On New Weapons, Which Are I

Think A Wrong Idea, We Just Decided To Uh

Send

Armed Vehicles To Ukraine And In The

A Moment That Was Decided The Next

Questions Were Raised About Whether We

Shouldn't

Send Western Tanks And What's The Next

Western Airplanes And Someday We Will Talk

About Western Troops, I Don't Know

So I Don't Think That This Is The Right

The Thing To Do, We Not Only Have The

The Military Dimension Of Working Together

But We Also Have Political And

Diplomatic Economic Dimension And Most

Of The Importance That We Act Together And That's

What's Happening That Means Not

Following Every Uh

The Idea Is Raised In The Public But

Instead Of Being, Reasonable Think About

Things Talk About Things And Agree On What

We Do With Our Alliance Okay To Stay

With A Question Of Weapons For The

At The Moment, There Hasn't Been Such Strong

Objections To A Supply Of

Older Soviet-era Tanks Are Now In Ukraine And

Their Allies Are Running Out Of Munition

For Those Tanks, What Will Be The

Consequences Wouldn't It Be Consistent

To Follow Up With Leopards

Well, I Don't Know If We Have Sent Other

Weapons To Ukraine That Have Proven

To Be Very Effective And Besides, I'm Not

Sure That Everybody Who

Takes Part In The Debate About Military

Things As A Military Expert I'm Not And

The Political Question For Us Is That We

Act Together With Our New Allies That's

The Main Point And We Just Had Another

The Decision It Was Not The Time To Follow Up

With A Very Fast New Decision

The Social Democrats Call For More And

Stronger Diplomatic Initiatives There

Have Been Efforts Diplomatic, Efforts

What Exactly Is Lacking In Your Opinion

Well The Problem With Demolish, Is What

Diplomacy Is If It Wants To Be

Successful, It Has To Be Behind Closed

Doors, Therefore It's Not Easy To Talk

About That Publicly Yet

There Were Initiatives, For Instance, The

Agreements With The Grain

Export From Ukraine, But That Was

Brought By The Turkish Government And

The United Nations And Its People Were Very

Skeptical And So We Cannot Do That

Because The Ships Are Not Sure And It

It Was Good That It Was Done

And I Wish That We Have Initiatives Like

That More With The Participation Of The

Western Alliance Rather Than The Turkish

President

That Would Be More Effective And It's

Always Something That Is Done Besides

All The Other Things, As I Said We,

Support Ukraine Politically

Economically Humanitarian Aid

Diplomatic Means Military Means And

Not Only What's The Only Public Debate I

See As A Debate About The Newest

Military

Possibility And I'm Very Skeptical

That It Will Be The Military That

Decides About Future Peace Orders In

Europe Um

There Are Military Experts In Security

Experts Say That In The Recent Past

Most Conflicts Haven't Been

Solved, Haven't Been Brought To A Peace

Agreement At The Negotiating Table But

On The Battlefield What Do You Say, I've

Read That, But I'm Not Sure That This Is

True If You Look For Instance At The

American Military Engagement Is The Last

Successful One Was

It's The Liberation Of Europe During World War II

Most Other Military Experiments That

From Vietnam To Syria Afghanistan Iraq

Haven't Been Successful I'm Leading A

The Committee That Looks At Afghanistan

War And The And Which Has Been Gone

Over 20 Years Was A Disaster At The End

And I Think We Should Avoid Thinking

That Political Difficulty Can Be

Solved By Military Means We Have To

Support Ukraine Not Be

Misunderstood By Military Means Also

Because They Have To Be Able To Defend

Themselves in Yet, The Solution For A

European Security Order In The Future

Won't Be A Military One

Still, If You See The Necessity To

Support Ukraine

As Well As Military

Support

Why Not With All Means, Why Not With

Everything That Is Available, Well There

Have Been Wishes In The Beginning Like

You Know Flight Zone

Obviously, We Couldn't Agree To

Because It Could Have Led To The

Involvement Of NATO, Being Part Of The

The War Which We Don't Want And I Would

Say We Have A Lot Of Common Interests Of

Ukraine But The Interests Are Not

Identical And So There Are Some

Perspectives On The War Are

Different And We Have Not Always

Agreement With All Our Neighbors In That

Most Important Is That The Allies Work

Together We Have A Common

Agreement With The United States And

With France

And We Try Very Hard To Do So And Put

Another Point Our Chancellor Who Is

Always Criticized For Being Slow

Deliberating Things Not Always Following

Up On Everything That Is Said That Has A

A Lot Of Support From The Public With Our

The Population Of People, You Talk To On The

Streets And You See That In The Polls

Therefore, I Would Say We Should Be Calm

And Do What We Have Done So Far, Can Go

Along With That Together With The Allies

That's The Best Thing To Do For A Russian

Dump, Representative Has Openly Called

For Killing The German Foreign Minister

Annalena Bear Book With High Precision

Weapons When She Was Visiting Ukraine In

The Light Of Such Remarks And Other

Threats We Hear Out Of Russia Are It

Really An Option To Negotiate With

Russia, Well This Is Outrageous, And We

Should Not Tolerate That And That

Putting The War Criminal Should Be

Tried And The Hague Is No Question For

I'm Not Talking About Any Sympathy

For The Russian Leadership, That's Not

The Point Is What Is

Reasonable To Do In Terms Of Supporting

Ukraine The Best We Can And In Our

Willingness To End The War As Soon As

Possible Without The Russians Being Able

To Reach Their Gain Their Aims They Have

That Cannot Be That An Imperialistic

War Is Successful And That Borders Can

Be Violated, That's Not Our Point Yet Moral

Rhetoric Doesn't Help Reasonable

Politics May Help And All The Things We

Try To Do It Together With Our Allies

So You Say More Weapons More Offensive

Weapons Are Not The Solution To This

Conflict Uh More Support On In Other Areas

Would Be Your Idea To Um

To Finish That War, Um Yet

What Would Your Angle Be On Which Level?

Could There Be A Diplomatic Approach?

Well As I Said Diplomatic Approaches Are

Only Successful If They've Done Behind

Closed Doors To Every Public Proposition

Every Proposal That's Public Would Be

Interpreted As Being Something Behind

Ukraine Without Their Involvement

That's Not Possible Ukraine Is A

Sovereign State And Therefore Diplomacy

Is Very Difficult

It's Quite, Uh, Doesn't Have The

Possibilities As All Those People

Talking In Talk Shows And Giving

Interviews And Saying What Weapon

They Think That Would Be The Right Thing To Do

And I'm Really Glad That Our Chance And

I Have The

Has The Possibility And Has

And Is Smart Enough Not To Follow Up On

Everything Which Is Said Publicly But

That's The Things That Have To Be Done

There Is A Meeting Of The NATO, Alliance

Coming Up In Ramstein Next Week, Do You

Think This Meeting Will Bring A Change

In The Western Approach, I Don't Know

I Don't Think That's Very Likely But

Nobody Knows The War Is Changing All The

Time, The Only Thing I'm Sure Of Is It's Not

Smart To Follow Up On Public Pressure

And We Won't Do That

Thank You Very Much, Thank You,

Enjoyed this article? Stay informed by joining our newsletter!

Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment.

About Author

My Name Is Mohammad Aslam My Caste Name Is Minhas I'm an Article writer I Lived In an Old Village