Now the eyes of the world are on Ukraine and Russia in Europe.
Europeans have seen such devastating wars that they are now terrified of even the slightest clash.
The Ukraine issue has been a volcano since 2014.
When Russia re-embraced Crimea and Dinas. Iran has blamed NATO in its first comment on Russia's attack on Ukraine. The West has been called the pioneer of civilization and research.
Our intelligent offspring enter the West for higher education, but these champion of peace could not justify the presence of NATO forces after the fall of Communism.
As a journalist, I have agreed to travel to Brussels, Berlin, Istanbul and Chicago for the most important NATO summits.
There I raised the question of whether the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) was established in 1949 by the United States, Canada and several Western countries for collective defense against the Soviet Union.
When the Soviet hammer flag was permanently taken down from the Kremlin on December 25, 1991, there is no longer any threat from communism.
What is the justification for NATO if the military alliance that was formed under the Warsaw Pact to compete with NATO is no more?
There was no direct answer.
However, it was said that NATO must be maintained in order to subdue some rebellious states and non-state actors.
When the United States invaded Afghanistan in October 2001, the President of the United States threatened the whole world with reluctance and asked if you were with us.
The same statement is now being made by the President of Ukraine.
"I do not see anyone supporting me in this war," he said. I'm asking everyone, "Are you with us?"
Look at Imran Khan's good fortune that he has gained such importance in history that he is the first foreign leader to meet Russian President Putin after Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
They both deal with their confidence as they choose to embark on their play activities.
Even so, owning one is still beyond the reach of the average person. We said in the previous column that we are all puppets.
Now I would like to say that the entire Pakistani nation, including me, is an expert in world affairs.
It also keeps a close eye on the history of wars.
We are all economists too.
We cannot solve the problems of our homes, families and neighborhoods, but we have the solutions to the problems of the world.
Our focus is not on circumstances but on personalities.
Some are suffering from malice aforethought.
Whether it is the global situation or the domestic one, they see it only with reference to Imran Khan.
Now it is being said that what is the use of this visit?
Sanctions were imposed, where did the gas pipeline and other issues go. The tour should have been postponed.
If the Foreign Ministry had postponed the visit, the same critics would have said that the visit should have taken place in any case.
In my opinion, Pakistan has got this very important opportunity.
We have deep ties with China. China is now fully aligned with Russia.
The situation in Ukraine, Russia, Pakistan and many other countries came under consideration at the recent summit in Beijing.
The Prime Minister should have taken the nation into confidence after his return from Beijing so that Pakistanis would realize the global significance of the Beijing Summit.
Then he would leave for Russia.
In the past, the Foreign Secretary or the Minister used to brief senior journalists and editors in Karachi and Lahore besides Islamabad on the off-the-record background.
Now that social media is active, such briefings have become even more important.
World leaders have always said Seize The Moment. Seize the moment
Pakistan and every ruler has been getting such opportunities. The United States is our ally.
We are its non-NATO ally. We have fully supported it since the invasion of Afghanistan.
How many of our citizens, military and senior officers have fallen victim to terrorism as a result of this alliance?
Every Pakistani asks how we have benefited from America's friendship in 75 years.
He did not support us in any war. How did the US deal with Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi and other Muslim leaders?
How many crises US policies have created in the Middle East. The United States has never condemned Israeli aggression.
Isn't it time for a decision? Russia has now challenged the US one-power system.
By the time you read these lines, the situation in Ukraine may have worsened or Ukraine may have conceded defeat.
2600 tanks and 12 thousand armored vehicles.
Russia has attacked its military bases and installations from three directions.
The West wants to plunge Russia into a financial crisis through economic sanctions, which will affect the imports and exports of Russian trading and industrial companies.
The United States is taking an interest in Ukraine in the name of democracy and development. In the name of democracy, it invaded Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya, but what happened there?
Democracy is the latter. In all three countries, people are in dire straits. Putin has threatened to strike a "conclusion" that you have never met before.
"Putin has chosen the path of war," he said.
Now they will suffer the consequences
You must be logged in to post a comment.