Over the past year, I have greatly assisted my colleague in writing a series of ten articles covering various aspects of my old astronaut theory. All ten of those articles were widely distributed around the world and viewing counters on many sites showed a lot of reading, but the answer to me, or to him, whatever it was, was not. There was no criticism or praise from anyone. Just be quiet. I began to think that perhaps no one on earth would want to take the ancient astrologers seriously.
In an effort to make some progress, I decided to pay $60 to upgrade my old astrological website. Yes, this was to be reviewed by skeptics; the revision of New Age believers would be in vain. The description of their blog was "critical reviews of unusual online claims." The consultant gave them five days to do their review, but that has been coming and going, and no word is coming out of them. My website produces a lot of evidence and, in fact, I did not expect anyone to produce a good critical review in just five days. No one, including me, would want to see immediate and irrational arguments presented, otherwise I would make them look absurd in my controversial arguments. Moreover, some of my testimony comes from Spanish language sources and, to begin with, they will need time to prove that there is no deception. They are always welcome to attend.
What to expect from this blog is uncertain. There are skeptics who have little idea in their thinking as New Age counterparts, and then, there are skeptics, like me, who honestly examine the evidence to reach the truth. Was there a real ancient astronaut? To help critics answer that question, I will give them some ideas on how to counteract my ideas. Here, the only consideration of space, I will focus on archaeological evidence, leaving comments on how to contradict the evidence of cryptology and theology one day.
My website is also recorded in the Tswana culture in Bolivia. One of the drawings depicts the ancient celestial body, which is believed to be a three-dimensional seawater, with each of the three ends ending in a pod. How do skeptics challenge that? It's easy. They just need to show that the shape of the pods is similar to that of the other animals or plants found in the area. In other words, they need to find the earthly source of those recorded texts, otherwise my foreign arguments remain undamaged.
The timing of the Tswana celestial paintings coincides with the period of the Nazca Lines in Peru, so the ancient astronaut of both places must have been one. In Nazca, skeptics will find many disputes that have already been settled, but I find them all weak. The attitude of the Nazis cannot be considered unique in human history. It should be noted that people in some places also believed that the sun, moon, or winds of the heavens had physical eyes that could detect low-lying images. Besides, it should be noted that the Nazis worshiped birds, believing that they were intelligent.
Drawings on the cosmological Sun Disk, which is suspected to be an external artifact, may be a major challenge for skeptics. How can we believe that Andean of the early sixteenth century a knew that the Earth is round, b knew that it was possible to orbit the Earth, c knew that the sunlight that shone in the moon could return to hit the spacecraft, d knew that dark clouds along the Milky Way have stars inside, and e did you know that water forms the basis for the evolution of plants and animals? Here, skeptics will need to find similarities in the history of western civilization. I look forward to their response.
You must be logged in to post a comment.