But, to be honest, what do you think? None of that, I believe, will ever be addressed. You get the impression that this was Sony and Marvel's one and only shot at bringing those films into the Marvel universe, and they've succeeded. That's terrific, but the ramifications will very likely muck up that reality. We don't know if a show like Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse will be able to handle it. Our best estimate is that Peter 2 and 3 will never be seen again. Let us know if you disagree in the comments section below. Of course, once everyone has returned to their respective realms, there is still the issue of the multiverse dragging every Spider-villain who has ever existed into this reality to deal with. (You noticed Rhino, and possibly a few others, in the shadows.)
The most heated debate with the new Peters isn't about what happens in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Everyone returns to their respective realms after the three Peters courageously save the city from Doc Ock, Green Goblin, Sandman, Lizard, and Electro. That is all there is to it. It isn't, however. The Spider-Men do not vanquish the villains in the usual sense; instead, they repair them, erasing all of their evil tendencies. We think that when all of those characters return to their own universes, they will no longer be evil. But when will they return? Do they return at the time of their death, which appears to be when they passed? Or do they come back now, after they've been dead for a few years? What influence will any of this have on the other Spider-lives Men's or the universes in which they live? Spider-Man, clinging to life for the sake of existence.
My first reaction was that if Aunt May was still alive, Peter would not have done it. Because his own true family, as far as we know, was murdered earlier in the film, he was able to make such a brutal, unselfish decision. Now, as the other Peter pointed out, she didn't die in vain. Once you get past that, the decision makes sense as a solution, but it further confuses the story. The following scene indicates that the world remembers Spider-Man and that he is still alive, but that Peter Parker is not Spider-Man. That's because no one knows who Peter Parker is these days. He isn't a real person. In a lot of ways, this puts Peter back where he started. Not only as a hero but also as a person. What about bank accounts, prospective inheritance, school, and all the other necessities of life? If you don't have an identity, these all appear to be incredibly large mountains to climb. Peter now has his own apartment (with what money?) and is studying for the GED, which is largely glossed over in the film. So, losing his identity likely meant no more high school, but he still intends to continue his schooling. He's devised a strategy. But, to say the least, it's all a little perplexing.
There's also the matter of the new suit to consider. From the perspective of a comic book enthusiast, the fact that the film concludes with Peter donning a homemade Spider-Man outfit suggests that the MCU's entire run thus far has been an origin narrative for him becoming the Spider-Man of the comics. He's finally at the point where he can do it on his own. Was he obliged to make that decision since the Stark suits were linked to Peter Parker, who no longer exists? Is Strange's magic compatible with modern technology? If that's the case, it makes that decision a little less powerful. Is Spider-Man still an Avenger, to put it in a bigger context? Sure, without Iron Man, Captain America, and Black Widow, the Avengers might not exist at all, but no one knows who Peter Parker is now. Is it enough for him to just approach Nick Fury, remove his mask, and reintroduce himself? What would someone's reaction be if they heard that?
Tum mere article read kro me tumhare karta hu dono ko fayda hoga
You must be logged in to post a comment.