The scale of the critical attack and the words referring to the well-known theory of special relationships have recently gained such a wide range that it is appropriate to talk about the impending disaster. Gradually a growing number of scientists, the many imperfections of this theory and the dead condition of the way science is presented become apparent. Clearly, it is time to radically improve STR and include it in the revision update. What does it take to get started?
In reprimanding STR writers, the fact is that they are more likely to be mathematicians than physicists. In the construction of the theory, Lorentz's conversion formula has already been successful, and they are trying to "fix" the truth in them. And as was initially chosen, all other roads “were soon cut off and were blocking the road to their destination. Therefore, the “mathematical” pull method was widespread.
In fact, direct philosophical-methodological approaches that liberate the viewer position and deny the discovery of objective aspects of natural topics and other events also play a dangerous role. Within the framework of the visual approach, a situation in which two viewers pass each other can adjust somespace and time reductions in another system and thus correct, will never be considered. The problem is natural for scientists who are attracted to materialism in similar situations: and what actually happens in these two systems? But instead of the answer, here they find a "fico" of good philosophy: apparently, nothing really; there is only one similarity of events that is considered to be the basis of science.
Therefore, two key operating flaws promoted by STR created the closure seen today. Therefore, it is necessary for us to put the problem within a consistent context in a rigorous analysis of the mechanism by which a path to the right solution can be found.
Earlier, in the article “Related Relationships and Related Outcomes”, we have already identified that the creators of STR have shown a shameful tendency to consider specific outcomes of space-time. They prefer a related reduction in length and reduction of times as the main effects, and the result of the correlation
Pushed into the second system, and presented in a state of dependence on the first two. For this reason they have designed that they did not detect the amount of clock malfunction, supporting the final result, in a thought test on Einstein's train that would have been more natural and simpler than that. The authors at STR used this experiment correctly and the quantitative measure was obtained later, after discovering Lorentz's conversion formulas for space and link time.
The result of this trend was that the effect of simultaneous correlation found itself in the STR field, and the methodological specifications presented were somewhat studied. There was a large error in it, as will be shown below. Some factors presented by this effect in the methodological context, appear to be so great, that they cause a great change in attitude towards the problem.
It is hypothesized that the effect of the “incorrect” correlation of clocks simultaneously lies in points corresponding to the line of motion associated with the two moving systems. The formulas for the value of these catches are found in STR. However, the significance of some details of the inaccuracies of physics, in our view, has been a misnomer. In our previous article, we tried hard to reveal this situation.
In fact, the question is whether in any point removed from each other near the line of the related movement of the two systems, there is a related distortion and a related shift of the timescale. We will consider the migration of a relative. Obviously, in one of the systems, all the events that occur at any time removed from the links of the two systems will occur in a limited proportion, and in some, appropriately, with a limited delay. The value of this removal indicates the dependence on the relative speed of the systems and the distances between the points corresponding to the movement line.
It is important to note that the indicated displacement occurs near the trajectory at the same time, changing from one point to another. The question is about the whole new value in our sense of time, role and the most important value to properly evaluate! This whole aspect actually undermines our common sense. We need to sharpen our perception of space a little, bit in order to understand it.
A special situation produced by a one-time relationship
Previously, we had already drawn attention to an unexpected problem generated by the result of a one-time relationship. If we add the time zone of the two system systems at any time (O = O`) to all the remaining parts of the line of their related movements, the related shift of the timescale will occur. In the result, synchronize in two programs those events that occur immediately at the point O = O `only possible. In particular, only the fastest vector values present at this point can be compared. All the remaining events come with a related time change, and this fact of avoidance / delay is required to compare the two systems. In fact, the two systems show significant related differences. Events meet in one place and change axis x.
So, with fast events alone, everything is easy enough. And how could it be by comparing two or more events at different times in different parts of the universe? Here comes a big problem. Factor related to forest conservation / delay e
You must be logged in to post a comment.