I don't know about you but when I go for a massage I expect the massage therapist to use their hands, fingers and maybe even their elbows to relieve my muscles full of stress. There is nothing more satisfying than two hands-on knowledge helping to remove all the bad things in my body that can make me depressed, anxious and, perhaps, even a little uncomfortable to be present sometimes.
I still vividly remember being visited by a physiotherapist because of a problem with a disc in my neck. The disc compressed the artery that caused my neck, back, and arm pain. The most annoying place was near my shoulder above my shoulder. As I sat in the massage chair, the healer used his elbow to dig into the affected area using force that caused great discomfort. But by the time I left that morning, the pain was almost gone. Now that was a massage!
Recently, I was introduced to the concept of Reiki. I studied different types of massage therapy and, in many cases, Reiki was listed as a treatment option or as part of a massage school. Learning more about Reiki made me question Reiki reference in the same context as massage. In fact, I began to wonder why Reiki had been put on a massage parlor at all. And I am not alone.
Massage is generally defined as “the process by which we relax the body's delicate tissues for the purpose of healing, healing, or relaxation.” I would think the word "fraud" is a word that works here. The Reiki practice takes a very different approach. Like Shiatsu massage, Reiki wants to balance "ki" or "life force" in the body. The theory, according to ancient Eastern philosophy, is that if this force is not balanced in the body, or disappears, then a person is at risk of physical and emotional illness. Reiki employees want to deliver power to their customers in a way that corrects inequality and promotes healing.
However, based on the specific methods of Reiki practice, there is no "fraud" involved. In fact, in some cases, there is no actual contact with Reiki treatment. That will bring about a conflict between the traditional definition of massage and the practice of Reiki.
Reiki, as it is done today, was developed by Drs. Mikao Usui, pastor and head of a Japanese Christian school. His disciples asked him how Jesus had healed them. Usui did not have an answer but focused on finding out how Jesus had healed the sick and infirm. (I think “because he was the Son of God” is not appropriate as an acceptable answer.)
Drs. Usui spent years studying in Christian schools, Buddhist monasteries, and temples. He did not get an answer to the question of healing until he began fasting for 21 days. At the end of the fast he apparently had a revealing experience that showed him the ways he wanted to understand. He then began the healing service. Finally, he shared his experience with Drs. Chujiro Hyashi who shared the information with Ms Hawayo Takata who trained 22 Reiki Masters who then shared the information with thousands of others.
In fact, Reiki transfers energy from Reiki's doctor to a patient. In fact, Reiki teaches that the patient draws the strength from a physician and thus gives the patient an active, responsible role in his or her healing process. Energy is then reorganized and balanced and harmony is restored to the body.
Although it is not a religion there is a lot of spirit that works in Reiki. God or the Universal Life Force is acknowledged and recognized as the source of all life force. Although there are some principles involved in Reiki, the real methods are very similar to the “laying on of hands” practiced by faith healers of many religious denominations. But “laying hands” is not the same as “soft tissue” that should be defined as massage.
There are a few problems here. First, massage is a form of solitude, making it difficult to see a medical center as an official method of treatment and healing. Under the help of physical therapy, massage is easily accepted and performed to restore muscle function and aid in the recovery process. However, there is a widespread view that massage in some way is a “mongrel” treatment that involves conventional medicine, alternative medicine, everything, health, New Age religion, indulgence, and mystical deception. The simple fact is that "soft tissue management" has been proven and accepted as a means of healing. It is a desire to incorporate any avocation healing that involves touching, or even being close to the hand and body, under a massage that causes confusion and suspicion.
Scientists and doctors have dismissed Reiki as a placebo that encourages patients to feel better because they have to feel better. Other questions about staff motivation are the fact that Drs. Usui, the founder of Reiki, decided that there should be a "power exchange" between a Reiki therapist and a Reiki patient in order to implant a patient in the healing process. This investment is financial in most cases and is the main goal of Reiki.
Another problem with Reiki being considered as a form of massage is that some states require Reiki doctors to obtain licenses as physical therapists. Most Reiki staff members oppose this section mainly because of the differences between Reiki and massage as mentioned in the descriptions presented at the beginning of this article.
Therefore, Reiki has a low schizophrenic personality. Reiki tutorials, on the other hand, are offered at most massage parlors. On the other hand, many doctors themselves do not consider themselves to be massage therapists. So, far be it from me to try to resolve this dispute in one article. Reiki can be a really effective heali or not
You must be logged in to post a comment.