What I'm going to tell you is that most supplement manufacturers do not make me a very popular person. In fact, some of them are exactly ****** on me. Some on the other hand are going happy, someone splattered and told the truth.
In the end, some of them are completely unaware of this information and are shocked when they read it. Basically, I totally hope that this article will cause a sh *% storm that resonates throughout the supplement industry.
The only people I know who are going to be happy with this article are the customers, but I'm ahead of myself. As we all know, creatine is one of the best bodybuilding supplements ever discovered. It increases strength, lean body mass and strength to some extent. If that doesn't fit, booting can be very cheap!
What else can we ask for from the supplement?
Creatine was very expensive when it was first introduced, but no one cared because it worked so well. As time went on, as more companies started selling creatine, the inevitable price war began and prices fell.
Creatine was only produced by a few companies at the time, so creatine was basically creatine and price was the only real consideration. As the market classifies, once creatine became big business, many new manufacturers emerged and it did not turn into a quality war like the price war. The expression "creatine is creatine" is no longer true. More about that soon.
At this point there may be four or five companies large enough to massively produce creatine for the sports nutrition market. Instead these companies sell their product in bulk to various distributors around the world.
In the case of large-scale manufacturers, one is a large German company, two are Chinese companies and two are located in the United States. Although there are many other companies, for this article we will basically deal with these five major producers, which probably have 80-90% share in the creatine product market.
Why I had to write this article
The subsidiary industry in the United States is a total self-regulated industry. Unlike other countries, the (USA) government is not constantly telling us what we can and cannot do with our supplements. Although they have been trying to downplay dietary supplements for decades, the FDA and the *************** / Medical Industrial Complex have largely failed to do so.
As a self-regulated industry, we must do the same. Let me say here and now, I am for self-regulation and completely opposed to government regulation when it comes to affiliations. When we find serious problems, we need to recover them regardless of cost. Any affiliation found to be potentially dangerous, terribly misleading, or a total scam should be disclosed.
If we do not, we will allow "powers" (those interested in discrediting the supplement industry) to move one step closer to the Orwellian landscape of other countries. I thought for a long time whether or not to write this article, but in the end, as a person with a good conscience and morals, I knew I had to do it.
Ultimately, if it does not expose problems related to a particular product, it will cost the entire affiliate industry a lot more than any single company would lose.
In my case, it's us or us ***** inter-industry laundry and our own policing, instead of waiting for the popular media or other groups to "do not confuse us with the facts". Following the affiliate industry.
I know I almost seem to be apologizing for writing this article, and myself in a way. This can cost some people a lot of money. On the other hand, it can make a lot of money for another person depending on where they fall (which makes more sense to readers as you read).
In the end, the truth can never be denied, only delayed. The longer the delay, the higher the cost to everyone. Suffice it to say.
Are you getting more than you paid for?
Most of us are always happy when we get more than we paid for, but in some cases it is not such a good idea. If we are buying vitamin C and the label says "500 milligrams per capsule" and the lab analysis shows 600 milligrams, that's a good thing.
However, if we not only test a product and claim the label, but also have many other compounds that we are unfamiliar with and have no place there, that is a completely different story.
For example, when the amino acid L-tryptophan is removed from the market for many deaths, it is not due to L-tryptophan, but due to a chemical contamination found in the L-tryptophan batch. . Should not be. This is a perfect example of getting more than you paid for in the worst possible scenario.
From what I'm going to write in this article, it's definitely not as bad as the L-tryptophan infestation, but it could be a health issue.
So after a long, subtle and strange introduction, what do I get? Recently, one company tested products from the five largest creatine manufacturers and various distributors in the United States, Germany, Great Britain and other countries.
At this point, the company conducting the test wants to remain anonymous, avoiding allegations that it has thrown stones at the supplement industry. However, it is a very large and well-known company and they stand behind their test results.
In addition, I know this company is one of the most famous companies in the world, so I have no problem with their test results or methods. The test result came to me from the back door, so to speak. So for whom was it tested and what did it reveal? Creatine products have been tested for: dicandiamide, creatinine, dihydrothiazine and sodium content.
What did the tests reveal? It has shown that there is a wide range
You must be logged in to post a comment.