what kind of education is crucial.

The tool of learning is the expression of one's interest.

Whenever this discussion pops up on the ground, what kind of education is better for children? Ironically, some might support academic learning entirely, which, in their eyes, is the best for children's wholesome growth, but in reality, is that enough for children's growth? Despite the prevalence of skill-based learning in many curricula, kids still lack interest in learning. What are the reasons for such an attitude? After several attempts, learning is still not fun-loving and is still unable to capture children's attention. Although governments from all over the world are planning a range of events at different levels to inspire parents and kids to engage in activities as well as do various kinds of experiments so that their interest in education will foster creative thinking, this is the only way to get their attention once more. The Chandrayan quiz, the Big Cat Alliance, and other initiatives are excellent examples of why the government is so keen to popularize them among its citizens.
What do we really gain from all of these efforts, though? Has it changed anything? In my opinion, not much after all, for children's better growth, what we actually desire is somehow continuous attention, while every child has a different processing approach, and it is quite unusual to consider all of them as one. If someone gives serious thought to a changing scenario, they will understand why more than 80 percent of the population is not motivated to study. Does it solely because academic studies are boring? Sorry, but it is not quite believable. The kind of education provided to the children's is not the way it should be, and somehow it is our responsibility if it is not up until now. What are the reasons for this continuous failure, what kind of changes are in need, and why youngsters feel pleasure in doing other business like You tubing, etc. but not studies?