The Supreme Court's decision regarding the electoral bonds program has been warmly received. The largest benefactor of the initiative, the Bharatiya Janata Party, has also praised it. The relationship between wealth and power that characterizes every democracy is unlikely to end, even though this decision might make the plan more visible.
The Communists referred to the Union government as the "Tata Birla ki Sarkar" during the Congress era. They call it the "Adani Ambani Sarkar" these days.
The Narendra Modi government cast a wide net, beyond large enterprise, and collected more than the majority of the contributions through the electoral bonds system. The Big Bull of Dalal Street, the late Rakesh Jhunjhunwala, is renowned for having told a journalist that the Agrawal community, which is part of the bania caste, "owned the country".
He exclaimed, "Look at the names—Jindal, Goyal, Mittal, Bansal, Singhal, and on and on." "So, boss, do we own the country or not?" A significant portion of the nation's corporate community is deeply committed to Hindutva, the BJP, and Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Why, therefore, does the BJP not own up to 90% of the electoral bonds that have been issued over the last five years?
The sociological makeup of the political power elite has undoubtedly been influenced by the changes in Indian politics during the previous seven decades. There is little doubt that their caste, class, and geographical makeup have altered.
One of the most significant structural shifts in the class and caste makeup of the dominant political elite has been the emergence of the intermediate caste The upper castes have continued to be represented in business and politics, from the Jats and Rajputs of North India to the Marathas and Patels of western India and the Reddys, Kammas, Velamas, Chettiars, and Nairs of the South.
You must be logged in to post a comment.