What is the Financial exchange Window for The Specialty Of Looking Shrewd?
stock market pricing data we use to aid us are all investors these days. If investors don't take the investing in Wall Street can be a minefield. Security prices change at least four times a year and are more influenced by institutional marketing strategies than by the economic forces we would like to believe are their primary determinants. Not even close. However, that is the maximum depth and distance it can go. What exactly are they referring to, and what exactly does it entail for you as an investor?
There are at least three none of which should make you happy, and all of them should make you question the honesty of the organizations that either allow, encourage or allow their use. The more well-known method involves replacing stocks in portfolios that have experienced significant losses with shares of businesses whose shares have been the most popular in recent months. In addition to making the managers appear smarter in reports sent to major clients, this practice makes the performance numbers of mutual funds appear significantly more appealing to potential "fund switchers." The prices of the stocks with the worst results are pushed even further down on the sell side of the ledger. If all fund managers will, of course, participate in the ritual. By the window, dressing is neither investing nor speculating. However, it would appear that no one is bothered by the morality or the fact that this "Buy High Sell Low" scenario is being portrayed by means of your Mutual Fund palette.
Before the portfolio's Quarterly, the more subtle form of Window Dressing occurs throughout the calendar quarter. This less common but even more fraudulent type invests in securities that are clearly out of sync with the published investment policy of the fund during a time when their particular field has fallen out of favor with the experts. Including popular emerging country issues or commodity ETFs Large for instance. Profits are taken before the quarter ends to ensure that the fund's holdings report is unaffected and that quarterly results are improved. The term "survivorship," the third type of Window Dressing, only affects investors in mutual funds, while the other two undermine the information used by individual security investors and their market performance. You might want to look into it.
The media's superficial coverage of these "business as usual" practices baffles me. Institutional money managers appear to be more concerned with politics and marketing than they are with investing, and institutional trading accounts for perhaps ninety percent of the price movement in the equity markets. By claiming ownership of hot tickets and none of the major losers, they are attempting to demonstrate their genius to their major clients. They are also manipulating the performance statistics in their marketing materials at the same time. They have established "Buy High, Sell Low" as the industry standard for investing. In the meantime, investors in individual securities receive incorrect signals and move in the wrong direction, resulting in collateral losses.
From an analytical perspective, this quarterly market value reality (artificially created demand for some stocks and unjustified weakness in others) completely contradicts the underlying company fundamentals for almost any individual security or market sector statistic. Consider the "demand pull" effect of a growing number of ETFs just for fun. I don't think I'm the only one who believes that the true meaning of security prices has less and less to do with corporate economics and more to do with the morning betting line on ETF of the new millennium. Do you recall the 1970s song "Circle of Gold"? Aren't GLD and IAU the same thing?
You must also take into account the impact of tax code-motivated transactions during the always entertaining final quarter of the as if all of these institutional forces weren't enough. After would never think that investing was done to make money! These euphemistically referred to as "year-end tax saving strategies" have essentially the same effect as the Type One Window Dressing previously mentioned. However, here is a fantastic buying opportunity during the off-quarter. Simply put, go out and buy the November 52-week lows, wait for the media to report on the mysterious “January Effect” with wide-eyed wonder, and make some quick money.
It's possible that there is no real way to determine the true value of a share of common stock. Is the market price determined by the fundamentals of the company an artificial demand for "derivative" securities, or a variety of institutional window-dressing strategies? However, this is a condition that can be used to your advantage financially. Trading appears to be the only operational alternative, with security prices being less closely related to traditional fundamental issues like dividends projected profits, unfunded pension liabilities, and perhaps more closely related to artificial demand factors! Take your profits on those that have risen to inappropriately high levels based and buy the downtrodden issues that are still fundamentally investment-grade. Then, try to complete the task before the major players do. To oversimplify, selecting investment-grade stocks at bargain prices, allowing them to simmer until a reasonable, pre-defined profit target is reached, and seasoning the portfolio brew with the discipline to actually implement the profit-taking plan would be a recipe for success.
Yes, I miss the days when only stocks and bonds were available, but maybe I'm just too old-fashioned. Wall Street is a fascinating location.
You must be logged in to post a comment.