what is special Relativity Lite Simplified Version

The ratings of the critical attacks and the words referring to the well-known theory of the special relationship have recently gained such a wide range that it is appropriate to talk about the impending disaster. Gradually a growing number of scientists, the many imperfections of this theory, and the dead condition of the way science is presented become apparent. Clearly, it is time to radically improve STR and include it in the revision update. What does it take to get started? In reprimanding the authors of STR, the fact was often stated that they were really mathematicians rather than physicists. In the construction of the theory, Lorentz's conversion formula has already been successful, and they are trying to "fix" the truth in them. And since the choice was made at the outset, all other means “were already killed and blocked off the road to them unknowingly. Therefore, the “mathematical” pull-down trend was widespread. In fact, direct-philosophical approaches to philosophical approaches that liberate the viewer’s position and deny the discovery of specific aspects of natural topics and other events have also played a dangerous role. Within the framework of the visual approach, a situation in which two viewers individually overlap each other can adjust for some reduction of space and time in another system and thus correct can never be considered. The problem is natural for scientists who are attracted to materialism in similar situations: and what actually happens in these two systems? But instead of the answer, here they find a "fico" of good philosophy: apparently, nothing really; there is only one similarity of events that are considered to be the basis of science. Therefore, two key operating flaws promoted by STR created the deadlock seen today. Therefore, it is necessary for us to put the problem within a consistent context in a rigorous analysis of the mechanism by which a path to the right solution can be found. Earlier, in the article “Related Relationships and Related Outcomes”, we have already identified that the creators of STR have shown a shameful tendency to consider specific outcomes of space-time. They prefer a related reduction in length and reduction of times as the main effects, and the result of the correlation is pushed into the second system and presented in a state of dependence on the first two. For this reason, they have been designed not to underestimate the value of measuring clocks incorrectly, supporting the final result, in testing the concept of Einstein's train that would be more natural and easier. The authors at STR used this experiment correctly and quantitative measurement was obtained later, after discovering Lorentz's conversion formulas for space and link time. The result of this trend was that the simultaneous correlation effect found itself in the STR field and the methodological specifications presented by it have always been slightly explored. There was a large error in it as will be shown below. The specific factors presented by this effect in the methodological context, appear to be so great, that they cause a great change in attitude towards the problem. It is thought that the effect of the "negative" correlation of clocks simultaneously lies in the points associated with the line of motion associated with the two moving systems. The formulas for the value of these estimates are found in STR. However, the significance of some details of the inaccuracies of physics, in our view has been a misnomer. In our previous article, we tried hard to reveal this situation. In fact, the question is whether, at any point removed from one another near a line of related motion of two systems, there is a related distortion and a related shift of the time scale. We will consider the migration of a relative. Obviously, in one of the systems, all the events that occur at any time removed from the links of the two systems will occur in a limited proportion, and in some, appropriately, with a limited delay. The value of this removal indicates the dependence on the relative speed of the systems and the distances between the points corresponding to the movement line. It is important to note that the indicated migration occurs near the trajectory at the same time, switching from one point to another. The question is about the whole new value in our sense of time, role, and the most important value to properly evaluate! This whole aspect perverts our common sense. We need to reinforce our sense of time with a little space in order to understand it. A special situation produced by a one-time relationship Previously, we had already drawn attention to an unexpected problem generated by the result of a one-time relationship. If we add the time zone of the two system links at any given time (O = O`) to all the remaining parts of the line of their related movements, the related removal of the time scale will occur. As a result, synchronize in two programs those events that occur immediately at the point O = O `only possible. In particular, only the fastest vector values ​​present at this point can be compared. All the remaining events come with a related time change, and this fact of avoidance/delay is required for the relative comparisons of the two systems. In fact, the two systems show significantly related inconsistencies. Events meet in one place and change axis x. So, with fast events alone, everything is easy enough. And how could it be by comparing two or more events at different times in different parts of the universe? Here comes a big problem. Forest related factor / e delay