Selfishness, which is now also seen in war. The United States and Russia did not make the mistake of reading the message when India restrained itself from voting for the RAW. One of the leading American newspapers, which has no qualms about displeasing the current government of India, openly expressed its displeasure, saying that it is difficult to call it "isolation", that it must side with Russia'' Both the countries have become strong in governing the country with 'nationalism of muscle power'. On the contrary, Russia's cheers were not suppressed. Although Russia did not pass a resolution condemning Russia's attack on Ukraine on behalf of the United Nations Security Council, the Indian diplomacy was a major victory for Russia. However, in the 15-member Security Council, India, along with China and the United Arab Emirates, has been credited with thwarting the vote, especially when Pakistan is on the same path abroad. India did not know how the two poles would react to the warming Cold War. Nevertheless, the complex calculation of self-interest that led Delhi to this point must be seen as diplomacy — nothing else. It is pertinent to note that the allegation that the position was taken in the guise of not taking the position is meaningless. Firstly, the shadowing of one's own interests in diplomacy is a natural phenomenon, and secondly, the post-World War II non-aligned movement in the post-World War II world would not be a strong claim.
No one is helping Ukraine, even if it talks about helping.
So the real question is human rights. The situation is dire
Worrying. In Ukraine
Although there are hundreds of reasons for Moscow's frustration with the situation
Aggression of this magnitude is completely immoral, inhumane - outspoken
Reprehensible. Twenty-first century nuclear-armed civilization
The customs of the world cannot be like that. And, such a country before
He has done so in such and such a place, A-Hen logic can also continue
No. They did wrong then, Russia is doing wrong now.
Notably, Delhi before and after abstaining from voting
Russia has called for a halt to the offensive
And repeated requests to disarm.
So look at the steps as multiple levels of diplomacy
Relevant. It is also true that the range of mediation will be exceeded
No. In fact, that range is now the highest in terms of diplomacy
Can become important.
Of course, India can play a major role in this. It should not be forgotten that the century has changed, day by day. India's 'interests' are now deeply rooted in America's friendship. With Islamic fundamentalism on the one hand and Chinese aggression on the other, there can be no question of India siding with America. So, at this moment of crisis, if Delhi can open a dialogue with Moscow as a third party, then the interests of all are likely to be protected, including the United States and NATO. But for that, intelligence and opportunity-seeking are essential. The next question is how much of that vision can be used in the Ukraine crisis, especially in the Indian diplomatic arena, which is a historical fact.
You must be logged in to post a comment.