In the early stages of man's abode in this world he made a friend and companion to a kind of tribal representative of our modern dog and in return for his help in protecting him from wild animals, and he took care of the sheep and gave some of his food to the corner of his abode and trusted him. And began to care. This animal may actually be very different from an unusually sensitive fox or sick wolf, driven by its companions to seek refuge in exotic environments from a herd of wild thieves. If some helpless wolves were brought home by early hunters and bred by women and children, the probability of starting a partnership was well anticipated. Dogs are introduced into the home as toys for children 'and' they take care of themselves and are treated as family members.
Traces of the domestic dog family can be found in almost all parts of the world, including the West Indies, Madagascar, the eastern islands of the Malay Archipelago, New Zealand and the Polynesian Islands. The dog, wolf or fox are a real tribal animal. In the ancient Oriental countries and generally in the early Mongolians, the dog was wild and neglected for centuries, and today roams the streets of every eastern city and wanders in packs, gauntlets and wolves. No attempt was made to attract it into human fellowship or to humbly improve it. We do not find any different breeds of dog form until we examine the records of the higher civilizations of Assyria and Egypt.
The dog is not much appreciated in Palestine, and in the Old and New Testaments it is commonly referred to as "unclean animal" with contempt and contempt. Even the familiar mention of the lamb in the Book of Job despises "but now those younger than me are making fun of me, whose father I hate to set up with the dogs in my flock." —And the only biblical reference to the dog as a recognized companion to man is in the Apocryphal Book of Tobit (v. 16), "so they both went forward, and with them the young dog."
The vast differences in the number of dogs of different breeds and their size, markings and general appearance make it difficult to believe that they may have a common ancestor. One wonders about the difference between the Mastiff and the Japanese Spaniel, the Deer hound and the fashionable Pomeranian, The Saint Bernard and the Miniature Black and Tan Terrier, and one is confused as to whether they may have come from a common ancestor. Yet the odds are no more than between Shire horses and Shetland ponies, shorthorn and Kerry cattle or Patagonian's, and Pygmies; And all dog breeders know how easy it is to produce different breeds by type and size by studying the selection.
To properly understand this question, it is necessary to first consider the structural identities of wolves and dogs. This identification of the structure is best studied by comparing the skeletal systems or skeletons of two animals, which are so close to each other that their transfer cannot be easily detected.
The dog has seven vertebrae in the neck, thirteen in the back, seven in the *****, three sacred vertebrae and twenty to twenty in the tail. The dog and the wolf both have thirteen pairs of ribs, nine are true and four are false. Each has forty-two teeth. They both have five forelegs and four hind toes, but externally the common wolf looks like a big, bear - ******* so the famous description of one works for the other.
Also, their habits are no different. The wolf's natural voice barks loudly, but learns to bark when confined to dogs. Although he is carnivorous, he also eats vegetables, and he eats grass when he is sick. In the chase, a herd of wolves splits into parties, one following the path of mine, the other using a considerable strategy, attempting to retreat with the feature exhibited by our sport dogs and terriers. When hunting in teams.
Another important aspect of the similarity between Cans lupus and Cans Familiars is that the gestation period in both species is sixty-three days. There are three to nine cubs in a wolf litter, 'and' they are blind for twenty-one days. They suck milk for two months, but during that time they are able to eat clumsy half-digested meat through their dam or their head.
Native dogs of all regions are close in size, color, form and habit to the native wolves of those regions. There are many examples of this very important situation, which can only be seen by chance. Sir John Richardson wrote in 1829 that "there are many similarities between North American wolves and Indian domestic dogs, with the only difference being in wolf size and strength."
The irrefutable argument against the dog lupine relationship is that not all pet dogs bark, but all wild dogs express their emotions only by howling. But the difficulty here is not as big as it seems, because we know that foxes, wild dogs and wolf cubs raised by ******* are easily accustomed. On the other hand, pet dogs that are allowed to run in the woods forget to bark, although some have not yet learned to express themselves.
The presence or absence of the Barking habit...
You must be logged in to post a comment.