Over the direction of the beyond year, I carefully assisted a colleague in writing a sequence of ten articles overlaying numerous factors of my historical astronaut theory. All ten of these articles circulated extensively around the world and look at counters on many webweb sites indicated ample readership, however comments to me, or to her, from anywhere, turned into non-existent. There turned into neither complaint nor acclaim from absolutely everyone. Just silence. I turned into beginning to suppose that possibly nobody in international desires to take historical astronauts seriously. In an try to make a few progress, I determined to pay sixty bucks for a overview of my historical astronaut internet site. Of direction, this turned into to be a overview with the aid of using skeptics; a overview with the aid of using New Age believers might be worthless. Their weblog’s description turned into “crucial opinions of paranormal claims at the Internet.” The middleman granted them 5 days to carry out their overview however that has lengthy due to the fact come and gone, and now no longer a phrase from them. My internet site offers a sizable quantity of proof and, in truth, I couldn't count on absolutely everyone to supply a terrific crucial overview in only 5 days. No one, such as myself, might need to look fast organized and frivolous arguments, else I might cause them to appearance ridiculous in my counter arguments. Moreover, a number of my proof comes from Spanish-language reassets and, to start, they might want time to confirm that none of it's miles a hoax. They are welcome to all of the time they want. What to count on from this weblog is uncertain. There are skeptics who're as narrow-minded of their wondering as their New Age counterparts, after which again, there are skeptics, like me, who objectively examine the proof to reach on the truth. Was there a actual historical astronaut? To assist the skeptics solution that question, I will provide them a few thoughts on the way to refute my theories. Here, completely for area considerations, I will deal with the archaeological proof, leaving apart thoughts on the way to refute the cryptology and theology proof for every other day. My internet site reproduces engravings from the Tiwanaku civilization in Bolivia. One of these engravings depicts the alleged historical astronaut as an aquatic with a 3-pronged tail, with every of the 3 prongs finishing in a pod. How do the skeptics refute that? Easy. They sincerely want to illustrate that the form of these pods resembles a few shape of animal or flora to be discovered in that region. In different words, they want to discover a terrestrial supply for the ones engravings, in any other case my extraterrestrial arguments stay unharmed. The timing of the Tiwanaku sky-god drawings coincides with the timing of the Nazca Lines in Peru, so the historical astronaut of each locations must be one and the same. For Nazca, the skeptics will locate many ready-made arguments, however I recollect they all weak. The mentality of the humans of Nazca can not be assumed to be precise in human records. It must be validated that humans some place else additionally believed that the sun, moon, or sky-spirits had bodily eyes that might look at floor drawings. Alternatively, it must be validated that the humans of Nazca worshipped birds, believing them to have cognitive intelligence. The recorded engravings at the cosmological Sun Disk, alleged alien artifact, may also show to be the largest task for the skeptics. How are we to trust that the Andeans of the early 16th century a) knew that the Earth turned into round, b) knew that it turned into feasible to orbit the Earth, c) knew that daylight putting the moon should mirror returned to strike a spaceship, d) knew that the darkish clouds alongside the Milky Way contained stars within, and e) knew that water shaped the premise of plant and animal evolution? Here the skeptics might want to locate parallels withinside the records of western civilization. I stay up for their response.
You must be logged in to post a comment.