NASA has officially announced plans to study UFOs or, as the government calls them, UAP (unidentified aerial phenomena). The mystery of what was once dismissed as conspiracy theorising has earned the more impressive description of "high-risk, high-impact" research. In the history of NASA, dozens of scientists, researchers, astronauts, etc., have raised the matter of UFOs, but the agency did not dare to take any action.
In the recent UFO hearings, some UFO footage by the military baffled the experts as they could not explain it. Renowned American physicist Michio Kaku says over 400 declassified UFO sightings defy the "normal laws of physics". Is it true? Former NASA scientist Paul R. Hill found in his UFO research that the objects do obey physics laws, but in a different way.
Paul Hill (1909–1990) was a respected NASA scientist when, in the early 1950s, he had a UFO sighting. Soon after, he built the first flying platform and was able to duplicate the UFO’s tilt-to-control maneuvers. Official policy, however, prevented him from proclaiming his findings. "I was destined," said Hill, "to remain as unidentified as the flying objects."
"Paul Hill has done a masterful job of ferreting out the basic science and technology behind the elusive UFO characteristics and demonstrating that they are just advanced and exotic extensions of our own technologies." Perhaps this book will help bring solid consideration for making all that is known about extraterrestrial craft publicly available. " —Edgar Mitchell, Sc.D., Apollo 14 Astronaut (from Unconventional Flying Objects).
For the next twenty-five years, Hill acted as an unofficial clearing house at NASA, collecting and analysing sighting reports for physical properties, propulsion possibilities, dynamics, etc. To refute claims that UFOs defy the laws of physics, he had to make "technological sense" of the unconventional object.
After his retirement from NASA, Hill finally completed his remarkable analysis. In his book entitled "Unconventional Flying Objects," published posthumously, he presented his findings that UFOs "obey, not defy, the laws of physics." Vindicating his own sighting and thousands of others, he proves that UFO technology is not only explainable but attainable.
Hill explained that one of the most consistently-observed characteristics of UFO flight is an ubiquitous pattern in which they tilt to perform all maneuvers. Specifically, they sit level to hover, tilt forward to move forward, tilt backward to stop, bank to turn, and descend by "falling-leaf" or "silver-dollar-wobble" motions.
The detailed analysis by Hill showed that such motion is inconsistent with aerodynamic requirements but totally consistent with some form of repulsive force-field propulsion. Not satisfied with paper analyses alone, Hill arranged to have various forms of jet-supported and rotor-supported circular flying platforms built and tested. Hill himself acted as a test pilot in early, originally-classified versions and found the above motions the most economical for control purposes.
In an effort to examine the force-field propulsion hypothesis yet further, Hill analysed a number of cases involving near-field interactions with an apparent craft, in which some form of force was in evidence. These include examples in which a person or vehicle was affected; tree branches were parted or broken; roof tiles were dislodged; objects were deflected; and ground or water was disturbed.
Under close analysis, the subtleties of these interactions combine to point unequivocally to a repulsive force field surrounding the craft while discriminating against propulsion mechanisms involving jet action, pure electric or magnetic effects, or the emission of energetic particles or radiation (although the latter may accompany the propulsive mechanism as a secondary effect).
You must be logged in to post a comment.