The divorce agreement is NOT a direct science. If the divorce settlement were statutory equality, we would not need courts and lawyers to resolve the dispute. Under the Family Law Act, courts are often required to consider various factors in determining who gets what. Too many women share 50% of marital property WITHOUT looking at issues such as the significant difference between your husband's income and your weekly / monthly income and any limitations on your age or health potential.
Another mistake is to let another partner keep the marriage home, EVEN if you can afford it. Local property tends to go up in value without doing anything. If you transfer this and your spouse pays you, then the problem is that you do not have enough money to buy your property. Money, stamp, legal fees, etc.,, can set you up to buy another home where you have no access. You are left with a deadline for rent.
While it is not a common mistake, some women will want to keep the marriage home where they cannot pay. If buying your husband's share of the house will involve taking out a large loan, you need to include monthly PLUS loans payments such as prices, construction insurance, public debt insurance, and general repair costs. Only then will you know whether you can afford to keep the house or not.
Failure to consider other issues such as child support and child support BEFORE agreeing on the division of marital property is another problem. These are not isolated issues.
It is the current value of the property under consideration - not the value of the exchange. This means that if a family car costs $ 10,000, it is often best to keep it. Too many women find themselves in need of a car to transport children to and from school, football training, etc. And double using what the family car was supposed to change. The same mistake is made again when it comes to wedding furniture and effects. They are usually second-hand (even newly purchased) and therefore not worth a lot of money. For example, the refrigerator you paid $ 1,000 for teenagers can now cost just a few hundred dollars. Keeping a lot of furniture (if in good condition) will prevent you from paying too much money to replace it.
Residences can be peaceful at times, but this does not mean that they are not equal. Do not accept the increase in the amount of money your husband may be putting on the property you want to keep and the lower price he may place on any property he wants to keep.
It’s amazing to find women (and sometimes men) arguing over small things. By that I mean, fighting for things with a small amount of money. It is useless to pay hundreds of dollars in legal fees to receive a $ 50 wedding voucher or a $ 150 stamp collection.
Another mistake is to look at other assets such as boats, trailers, equipment, pensions, pension funds, shares, stocks, and life insurance as marital assets and/or financial resources.
Too many women believe that if they go “soft” in their payment rights, their husbands will be easier to deal with for children. This method rarely produces the desired result. The actual result is usually that your spouse sees that you are weak.
Another common mistake is to seek financial advice from an attorney instead of a financial plan. What do lawyers know about financial planning?
Some women come to believe that reaching an agreement with their husbands, is a legal obligation. Not so - even if it is in writing and both parties have signed.
Finally, too many women donate to their husbands because that is what they have been doing. Now is the time for independence. You are facing divorce and divorce, which means you should be more concerned about your financial future more than ever!
You must be logged in to post a comment.