Important attacks and comments measure that addresses known theories of special relatives has recently imposed a range of spoken about nearby crisis. Gradually many scientists will reveal a number of incompleteness of this theory and the dead condition of the scientific way introduced. Clearly, it is STR that affects correction revision at that time. What do you need to start?
It is accused of STR writers, and facts they were really mathematicians but were repeated as physicists. When building theory, the Lorentz transform equation has already tried to adapt them to their reality. And since the choice was first done, all other options were simply killed, and it was uninterested from the road. Therefore, the deductive "mathematical" methodology has spread.
years, the position of the viewer is philosophical methodologic method Available in the full-deny nature topic and objective function availability for other phenomena plays a harmful role. As part of the musicalism methodology, as part of the materialistic methodology, alternative spatial and temporal reductions in other systems of other systems are repaired. . You can think it will be on the right side. Of course, the problem is that scientists win in the same situation about the materialism: And in fact what happens with these two systems? But instead of the answer, you will receive positive philosophical "Fico": It seems that it has no relationship. There is only one subjective look of the phenomenon seen as a scientific basis. So the two essential methodological defects, strokes, start, deadlocks observed today today. Therefore, it is necessary to experience problems in the relativistic situation of strict methodological analysis that can find the way to the correct solution. Previously, in the article of "relative to the concurrence of other relativity effects", we have already confirmed that the STR creator has shown the trend of the scandal considering the space-time relativistic effect. Yes. They favor a relative reduction in length and duration of decline as the main effect, and the effect of simultaneity relativity is pushed into the second plan
and shown to be dependent on the first two. I am. For this reason, they deliberately did not derive a clock miss value based on the latter effect from a thought experiment on Einstein's train. This is very natural and fairly easy. The creators of the STR used this experiment qualitatively, and the quantitative ratios were later derived by obtaining the Lorentz transformation equations for spatial and temporal coordinates.
The result of this biased approach was that the effect of simultaneity relativity appeared in the backyard of the STR, and the peculiarities of the methodologies introduced by it were rarely investigated. There was a serious error in this, as shown below. The specificity that this effect brings to a systematic situation seems to be so important that it causes a fundamental change in attitudes towards the problem. The effect of the theory of relativity of simultaneity due to the "timing shift" of the
clock is thought to be at points along the line of relative motion of the two moving systems. The expression for this misstime value is derived by STR. However, some importance of the details of the timing shift to physics was hardly reflected in the theory in our opinion. In the previous article, I tried to clarify this situation in more detail.
In fact, the point is that there are relative distortions and relative shifts in the time scale at all points that are far apart from each other along the line of relative motion of the two systems. Pay attention to the relative displacement. It is clear that in one system all events that occur at any point away from the coordinate origins of the two systems occur with a relative delay, and in the other system they occur with a corresponding relative delay. The value of this shift shows the relative velocity of the system and its dependence on the distance between points along the line of motion.
It is important to note that the displacements displayed occur simultaneously along the orbit and vary from point to point. The question revolves around a new overall factor in our spatiotemporal perception, a very important role and value to be properly evaluated! All this element basically distorts our normal way of cognition. To understand that, we need to use our spatiotemporal imagination a little.
Special Situations Caused by Simultaneous Relativity We have previously focused our attention on the unexpected problems caused by the effects of
Simultaneous Relativity. Combining the origins of the spatiotemporal coordinates of the two systems at any point (O = O`) causes a relative shift in the time scale at all remaining points in the line of relative motion. As a result, only events that occur instantaneously at point O = O` can be synchronized between the two systems. In particular, you can only compare the instantaneous values of vector quantities that exist at this point. All remaining events are displayed with some relative time shift. The relative comparison of the two systems requires the fact of relative prediction / delay. In fact, these two systems show considerable relative non-linearity. Events meet at some point and change along the x-axis.
Well, in individual momentary events, everything is simple enough. And how about comparing two or more events happening in different parts of the universe at the same time? A big problem arises here. Relative prediction / delay factors of events at various points make such comparisons essentially impossible. what do you mean?
You must be logged in to post a comment.