That You Resign!' Every Rand Paul vs. Dr. Fauci
Severe disease for many years in this study which was published in science Fauci showed that antibody levels relatively constant with only modest declines over six to eight months reported that notably memory b cells specific for the spike protein or were detected in almost all covid 19 cases with no apparent half-life at five to eight months after infection in other words Dr. Fauci found significant evidence of long-term immunity after coveted infection furthermore Dr. cruddy noted b-cell memory to some other infections has been observed for as long as 60-plus years after smallpox vaccination or even 90 years after a natural infection with influenza that was a woman who got the showed immunity 90 years later so rather than being pessimistic towards people gaining immunity after they've had covid or had a vaccine studies argue for significant optimism in fact there have been no scientific studies arguing or proving that infection with covid does not create immunity there have been no studies showing significant numbers of reinfections of the 30 million who have had covid only a handful of reinfections have been discovered in fact times reported last fall more than 38 million people at the time worldwide had been infected with the coronavirus and as of that date fewer than five of these cases had been confirmed by scientists to be re-infections scientists interviewed for the article concluded in most cases a second bout with the virus produce milder symptoms or none at all given that no scientific studies have shown significant numbers of reinfections of patients previously infected or previously vaccinated what specific studies do you cite to argue that the public should be wearing masks well into 2022 not sure i understand the connection of what you're saying about masks and re-infection we're talking about people who have never been infected before you're telling everybody to wear a mask whether they've had an infection or a vaccine what saying is they have immunity and everybody agrees they have immunity what studies do you have that people that have had the vaccine or have had the infection are spreading the infection if we're not spreading the infection isn't it just theater no it's not a vaccine you're wearing two masks isn't that theater no that's not here we go again with the theater let's get down to the facts okay the look at in vitro examination of memory immunity which in their paper they specifically say this does not necessarily pertain to the actual protection it's in vitro and what study can you point to that shows significant reinfection there are no studies that show let me finish the response to your question if you please the other thing is that when you talk about reinfection you don't keep in the concept of variance that's an entirely different ballgame that's a good reason for a mask in the study conducted by j and j they found that people who were infected with wild type and were exposed to the 3-5-1 it was as if they had never been infected before they had no protection so when you talk about re-infection you've got to make sure you're talking about wild type i agree with you that you very likely would have protection from wild type for at months if you're infected but we in our country now have variants that are circulating significant reinfection what study shows significant reinfection hospitalization and death after either natural infection or the vaccine it doesn't exist there is no evidence that there are significant re-infections after vaccine in fact i don't think we have a hospitalization in the two-week period after the second vaccination yeah you have a death in the united states you're not hearing what saying about variance we're talking about wild-type versus variance and what proof is there that there are significant re-infections with hospitalizations and death from the variants none in our country zero well because we don't have a prevalent of a variant we're having one can finish we're having one seven that's becoming more dominant policy based on conjecture no you have isn't based on conjunction so you some you want people to wear a mask for another couple years you've been vaccinated you parade around in two masks for show no you can't get it again there's almost there's virtually zero percent chance you're gonna get it you're telling people with them that have had the vaccine who have immunity you're defying everything we know about immunity by telling people to wear masks have been vaccinated instead you should be saying there is no science to say we're going to have a problem from the large number of people being vaccinated you want to get rid of vaccine hesitancy tell them they can wear their mask after they get the vaccine you want people to get the vaccine give them a reward instead of telling them that the nanny state's going to be there for three more years you got to wear a mask forever people don't want to hear it there's no science behind it well let me just state for the record that masks are not theater masks are protective we have immunity there theater if you already have immunity you're wearing a mask to give comfort to others you're not wearing a mask because of any science i totally disagree with you Dr. Faucie we don't know whether the pandemic started in a lab in wuhan or evolved naturally we should want to know three million people have died from this pandemic and that should cause us to explore all possibilities instead government authorities self-interested in continuing gain of function research say there's nothing of function research as you know is juicing up naturally occurring animal viruses to infect humans to arrive at the truth the us government should admit that the wuhan virology institute was experimenting to enhance the coronavirus's ability to infect humans juicing up super viruses is not new scientists in the u.s have long known how to mutate animal viruses to infect humans for years Dr. Ralph Barrick a virologist in virology institute sharing his discoveries about how to create super viruses this gain of function research has been funded by the nih the collaboration between the u.s. and she worked together to insert bat virus spike protein into the backbone of the deadly virus and then used this man-made super virus to infect human airway cells think about that for a moment the virus had a 15 mortality we're fighting a pandemic that has about a one percent mortality can you imagine if virus that's been juiced up and had viral proteins added to it to the spike protein if that were released accidentally Dr. Fauci do you still support funding of the nih funding of and completely incorrect that has not ever and does not now und gain of function research in the Wuhan institute do they find our doctor we do not fund do you Dr. barracks gain of function research Dr. Barrett does not Doing gain or function research and if it is according to the don't think it's concerning a bat virus spike protein that he got from the viruses gain of function that is not a minority because at least 200 scientists have signed a statement from the working group saying that it is gain of function well it is not and if you look at the grant you look at the progress reports it has not gained a function despite the fact people tweet that you're trying to build a report sending money to the wuhan virology institute we do not send money now to do one Hun sending money we did under your tutelage we were sending it through eco health it was a sub agency and a sub grant do you support the money from that was going to the Wuhan institute let me explain to you why that was done would have been irresponsible of us if we did not investigate the bat viruses and the serology to see who might have been perhaps it would be in china possible to send it to the chinese government that we may not be able to trust with this uh knowledge and with this uh incredibly dangerous government scientists like yourself who favor gain of function i don't favor that are not correct government defenders of gain of function such as yourself say that Covid 19 uh mutations were random and not designed by man but interestingly the technique that Dr. Barrick developed forces mutations by serial passage through cell culture that the mutations appear to be natural in fact Dr. barrack named the technique the magazine said nobody would know if the virus had been fabricated in a laboratory or grown in nature governor authorities in the including yourself unequivocally deny that covet 19 could have escaped a lab wasn't so sure according baker Dr. she wondered could this new virus have come from her own laboratory she checked her records frantically and found no matches that really took a load off my mind she said i had not slept for days the director of the gain of function research in couldn't sleep because she was terrified that it might be in her lab Dr. Barrick an advocate of gain of function research admits the main problem that the institute of virology has is the outbreak occurred in the odds responded could you rule out a laboratory escape the answer in this case is probably not will you in front of this group categorically say that the covid 19 could not have occurred through serial passage in a laboratory do not have any accounting
You must be logged in to post a comment.