The debate over the presidential system has spread.
It started with social media, but now it has affected everything that is spoken. Electronic media, and print media, are also expressing their views.
A private TV channel called a regular referendum, citing the blessings of the presidential system, urging people to express their views in favor of it, and assuring that if a large number of people came out in the field, the policy The pressure on the makers will increase, and they will seriously consider establishing a relationship with the so-called "presidential lady", eventually bringing him home in a dolly.
It will just start raining again.
This BB will make everyone rich as soon as they step foot in the house, that is, it will make Pakistan America that the American presidential system has made it the greatest power in the world.
Therefore, the presidential system of Pakistan will also make this dear country America.
This is the archetypal version of America, the strongest.
Name your prime minister as president, elect him directly, oust the current occupant of the presidency, play the cornice in front of a newcomer, and simply make Pakistan the United States.
One of the benefits would be that the Prime Minister's House would be vacated, making it easier for it to deliver on its promise of a university. The price of mango kernels.
The Prime Minister will be made the President, and the President will be removed from the Constitution and the Presidency.
What the President and the Prime Minister do with separate national treasuries, now only the President will be able to do, billions of rupees will be saved in one go.
Debate continues on every TV channel.
Grameen Anchor is busy wrestling the presidential and parliamentary system.
One by one questions are being asked. Politicians are also being harassed under the same pretext.
The leaders of both the opposition and the government are at loggerheads.
And you and the National Assembly and the Senate are making smoky speeches.
PML-N Secretary General Ahsan Iqbal has removed the dust of the heart by submitting a formal resolution.
It has been reported that the government is trying to cover up its shortcomings or turn a blind eye to them.
Satisfaction will continue to be something that has been happening, or is happening.
The government is angry with the opposition, dear Farrukh Habib is having regular turmoil, fires are raging that the government has taken over the economy, Sharkh has increased growth, has reduced the debt burden, people's The prospects for revenue growth are thundering, the opposition is beating the drums of the presidential system to divert attention from this disgusting thunderstorm. Our rhetoric is being disrupted by stirring up debates about the system. The pockets of the people are getting heavier and heavier. ۔
What do we have to do with the presidential system?
When we have largely done what we were supposed to do through the parliamentary system, which could not be done, it will be done in the next few months. Start singing the tune of the presidential system, confuse the people, make them suspicious of you, spoil the taste of relief they get, drive away the comforts, blow them away.
Even if the government is satisfied that it has changed the destiny of the country under the parliamentary system, and turned the failures of the PML-N into successes, and the opposition also claims that it has changed Pakistan during its tenure.
It was the cradle of peace and the arena of wrestlers.
The growth rate was touching six percent.
Inflation was very low, interest rates were low, industries were to be set up under C-Pack, the country was filling up with floods, then why the debate on the system?
If both claims are accepted, then who is talking about changing the parliamentary system?
He should be traced, he should be asked who is behind it.
Who is shaking his rope? Who is seducing him, and who is intimidating both the government and the opposition.
Regardless of whether such an amendment can be made in our constitution or not?
Can the federal parliamentary system be changed in the presence of Supreme Court decisions? Can a referendum be held for this purpose or not? Even if you vote, the constitution will not change automatically, only a two-thirds majority of both houses of parliament will be able to do so.
The will of the people will prevail over the will of the judges, even then we will have to go to the parliament, for the amendment of the constitution the support of two-thirds majority will be required.
In the current parliament, both the government and the opposition are losing the benefits of the parliamentary system. Both the PTI and the PML-N claim to have changed the situation through it.
The PPP is also not behind anyone, it is complaining about being the creator of the constitution, then how will the presidential system come? If Gohar Maqsood is to be achieved through a step beyond the constitution that in the past also this system was revealed as a divine calamity, it enveloped people without asking them, then why ask now?
Why do they need to be lifted? They have repeatedly said that the parliamentary system suits our minds.
The virtues of the presidential system in its place, its good qualities are also acknowledged but it is not accepted.
Why? Why? Whoever wants to or can do whatever he wants?
He can do whatever he wants but remember that it is also written in the pages of history that the desire to change the constitution had changed the geography.
History is screaming and saying that I Can't change, don't try to repeat me.
You must be logged in to post a comment.