A Cognitive Test for Microcosmic Research
(Scientist with a hangover)
I
Imagine that a physical examiner has the task of determining the links of a particular micro-particle on the X-axis in an instant.
In general, in the measurement action in the microcosm, there are fixed limits expressed by Heisenberg uncertainty, or the principle of non-determination. These limits affect the combination of parameters for small particles that can be measured simultaneously with negligible accuracy. But in this case, it is only one action to measure a simple parameter on only one axis. So even the strongest physicist will say, it is possible without limits. This work is very real.
So, our tester starts the story. It is important to emphasize, that there will be no obscure local cloud of possible values, not an abstract matrix mathematical, not a transformation of any mysterious function ?, but a concrete point in the abscissa axis. It is the result of an accurate measurement that is localized at the time and the axis of a single link area.
However, the situation is complicated because the inspector has begun his career of having a severe hangover after a massive junket yesterday. It was difficult for him to hit the first red button, so he missed and did not start the study. The measurement action was not possible.
No worries. It is possible to make an estimate over time. Assume that our physicist has decided to postpone the measurement action until the time period T2 = T1 + t, when t = 1 minute. Since the first measurement action had not taken place, basically the situation had not changed. Restrictions have not been set. The new acceptable standard is made with careless accuracy. If all is well, the tester will find the correct combination of small particles X2. It will also be a point on the abscissa axis, but elsewhere. Some have already speculated that our physicist missed the first red button again. Also, the measurement did not occur. He repeats the test and then misses point X3.
So, we will explain the situation. Our experimenter had a series of possibilities to accomplish a rapid measuring action T1, T2, T3… T (n)… by t separated by spaces. In any of these, he can find an accurate combination of small particles on the abscissa axis X1, X2, X3… X (n)…. We take advantage of the fact that in the experiment of thought, it is possible to allow certain humorous things, we will force the interval of time to tend to zero. All in all, we will find an endless series of points on the axis where the space will be closer to zero. Points actually combine into one curve.
What is this twist? It is a drawing of precise links of small particles near the abscissa axis over a period of time. Therefore, at any time within this space, there will be a point in the curve, which has a direct connection to the abscissa axis. In other words, each point in this curve can be obtained if the examiner in time will start the measurement action. Obviously, a strong cut here takes place; no random and possible loop-holes.
But that is not all. We would assume that our physicist was so awkward that he touched the device and inadvertently changed the weight of the measuring instrument from X-axis to Y-axis. Now all ratings will work on the link axis. In general, a concrete curve with measurable links of small particles will also be available. All the axes in our position are the same, so thanks to the same mental strategy, we can find an accurate curve near the Z axis.
Therefore, we cut three curves in line with the three axes. They can be integrated into a single local curve that can safely be called a “trajectory”. If the inspector performs only one measuring action on any of the three axes at any one time within a given area, he establishes a point in this curve (and nowhere else!). Alternatively, each point in this local curve can be obtained by measuring instantly any of the three axes we choose. There is a perfect connection that does not allow for different interpretations.
As a result of this experimental study, we come to the conclusion that the flow of tiny particles is actually present, has an accurate location in space and time and can be easily detected with careless accuracy at any time on any selected axis. This is a decision-making process.
II
Problems will arise when we set the reception function, say, the exact links for two or more points at a time. Here an important limitation of the nature of our relationship with the microcosm is already in effect. We call it the “second rate problem”. Twentieth-century physicists have described it with the help of uncertainty, or uncertainty, of the Heisenberg system.
There are phenomena in the human experience of the macrocosm; there are events in the microcosm. And there is the process of transmission, of the introduction of microcosm events into our macrocosm. It is important to emphasize that the above-mentioned problem does not affect events in the human macrocosm and microcosm. It only affects the translation process. Here on the border of the two worlds, there are some important issues that we have already written about in the article "Ring Determinism and Probability".
It can be explained at the outset how difficult it is to transfer more than one (precisely careless) amount of measurement from microcosm to human macrocosm. What will be the additional costs required? Now that is a factor in our practice
You must be logged in to post a comment.