The question many of the symptoms you describe also apply to other personality disorders (for example, histrionic, antisocial, and borderline personality disorders). Should we assume that all personality problems are related?
Answer A breakdown of Axis II personality problems - deeply ingrained, negative, lifelong behavioral patterns - in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, fourth edition, text review [American Psychiatric Association. DSM-IV-TR, Washington, 2000] - or DSM-IV-TR for short - has received ongoing criticism since its inception in 1952
The DSM IV-TR adopts a phased approach, stating that personality disorders are “clinical signs of varying quality” (page 689). This is widely questioned. Even the distinction between “normal” and “occult” personality is increasingly ignored. “Diagnostic thresholds” between normal and abnormal are absent or slightly supported.
The Diagnostic Criteria polytheistic form of DSM - the only subset of procedures that are sufficient for diagnostic reasons - produces unacceptable variability of diagnosis. In other words, people diagnosed with the same human condition may share only one condition or nonexistence. DSM fails to specify the direct relationship between Axis II and Axis I disorders and how the child's chronic and developmental disorders are associated with personality disorders. Differential diagnosis is unclear, and personality disorders are not adequately differentiated. The result is co-morbidity (multiple Axis II diagnosis). The DSM contains a small discussion of what distinguishes a typical character (personality), personality traits, or personality style (Million) - and personality traits. Lack of documented clinical experience regarding both the disorder itself and the usefulness of various treatment options. Many personality problems are "not defined in any other way" - the catchall, "category" basket. Cultural bias is evident in certain problems (such as Antisocial and schizotypal). The emergence of other dimensions in the phased approach is acknowledged in the DSM-IV-TR itself: "Another way of the class is the dimensional view that Personality Disorders represents a vicious variety of personality traits that blend invisibly into one another and become one another" (p.689)
The following issues - which have long been ignored
in the DSM - may be addressed in future plans and in the current study:
The longitudinal course of the disorder (s) and their temporary stability from childhood onwards;
The genetic and biological foundations of human disorders;
The development of human psychopathology in childhood and its emergence in adolescence;
The link between physical health and disease and personality disorders
The effectiveness of various therapies - speech therapy and psychopharmacology. All personality disorders are related, at least in context - although we do not have the Grand Unifying Theory of Psychopathology. We do not know if there are any - and what - the mechanisms that cause mental disorders. Best of all, mental health professionals record symptoms (as reported by a patient) and symptoms (as seen). After that, they combine them into syndromes and, in particular, into complications. This is an explanatory science, not explanatory science. Sure, there are a few etiological theories around it (psychoanalysis, to say the least) but all have failed to provide a coherent, consistent theoretical framework capable of predicting. Patients with personality disorders have many things in common:
Most of them are persistent (except those with Schizoid or Avoidant Personality Disorders). They want a treatment that is selective and appropriate. They complain of many symptoms. They never listen to a doctor or his recommendations and treatment. They see themselves as unique, displaying a series of greatness and diminished empathy (the ability to appreciate and respect the needs and aspirations of others). They consider the doctor to be inferior to them, distorting him from the ten-pronged approach and burdening him with his unrelenting self-esteem. They are cunning and abusive because they do not trust anyone and often cannot love or share with others. They are socially polite and emotionally stable. Many personality disorders start out as problems in adolescence that reach the peak of adolescence and become a personality disorders. They live as the lasting qualities of each individual. Human problems are stable and pervasive - not episodic. They affect many of the patient's workplaces: his or her work, his or her relationships with other people, and his or her community service. Ordinary patients are not happy. She is depressed, suffering from supportive emotions and anxiety disorders. He does not like himself, his character, his (poor) performance, or his (disabled) influence on others. But his defense is so strong that he only knows stress - not for your own reasons. A patient with a personality disorder is at risk and is prone to a host of other psychiatric disorders. It is as if his immunological system is paralyzed by a personality disorder,and he suffers from some form of mental illness. Too much force is applied to your disability and compliance (for example coercion, or mood swings) so that the patient loses self-defense.
Patients with personality disorders are alloplastic in their defenses. They have an external control area. In other words: they often blame the outside world for their mistakes. In stressful situations, they try to release in advance the threat (real or imagined), changing game rules, introducing new variables, or otherwise the flu.
You must be logged in to post a comment.