If a butterfly flaps its wings in Brazil, can that flap cause a tornado in Texas? Only a mentally deranged person can ask such a question. Because the flapping of a butterfly's wings, anything else, cannot cause a tornado. And if there is a tornado, how can it be in Texas instead of Brazil!
Although unbelievable, according to science it is not impossible. Like the flapping of a butterfly's wings, any small action can have a huge impact on the final outcome of an event. And this theory is called 'Butterfly Effect' or 'Butterfly Effect'.
The inventor of this theory was Edward Lorenz, a professor of meteorology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a mathematician. In 1950, when searching for a new method for weather forecasting, he used only the mathematical value of 0.506, as opposed to the original number of 0.506127. He then found that the impact on weather forecasts for small changes in quality was not small, but massive. This is called the chaos theory called butterfly effect.
At the 139th session of the 'American Association for the Advancement of Science', Lorenz actually wanted to understand how small changes in a complex manner can affect the properties of that matter through the question of flapping the butterfly's wings.
Let's tell a story to explain more simply. During a meeting in Rahman's (fictitious) office, he got news that his daughter had slipped and got badly injured. He left the office and rushed home. Meanwhile, the office staff said. Hasan returned home early and went out to watch movies with his wife and children. He is bedridden after a sudden car accident while eating ice cream on his way home after watching a movie.
Think about it, Md. Rahman's daughter slipped and fell if the incident did not happen. Hasan could not have planned to go home and watch a movie, and the accident would not have happened. A contrary argument can be made if desired. But knowing some historical facts, the butterfly effect cannot be ignored.
It is surprising to hear the story behind Kursk being the lucky city of Japan, and Nagasaki being the city of destruction. Because the US pilots were not supposed to drop the atomic bomb on Nagasaki. Instead, their target was the Kursk City military base.
When American bombers flew to bomb the city of Kursk, Kursk's skies were overcast. As a result, the pilots could not see the arsenal in any way. Nagasaki city was decided as the target after 3 consecutive attempts, but it was not possible to hit there.
Because of this little cloud, the city of Kursk was spared from the terrible bomb blast. On the other hand, because of this little cloud, Nagasaki was destroyed without being targeted by the American pilots.
In 1906, a painter in Vienna fell in love with a Jewish girl while painting. Then he was caught exchanging letters through his beloved dog. A wealthy Jewish family found out about his disorder and killed the dog. Unable to bear that grief, he later joined the British Army.
There is another problem. In 1918, a British soldier beat him up and seriously injured him and tried to kill him. He was then kindly released. And that painter is Adolf Hitler. About 6.3 million people lost their lives in World War II. What if Hitler had not been rejected in love or killed that day? Maybe so many lives could have been saved.
In the middle of this is the question of the butterfly effect. Which cannot be denied, even if you don't want to accept it.
You must be logged in to post a comment.