Aliens, as in cosmic visitors, provokes all manner of human reactivity. Here, the characterization has nothing to do with human creatures seeking asylum or other amenities from a host country. Instead, the focus is interplanetary. Likewise, traveling the universe inspires a variety of notions. As to how such things happen, science collides with science fiction. Many questions arise. With that, quite a few have opinions. Yet, bottom-line, among humans interested in this particular field of query, as in questions usually asked by criminologists, who stand to profit. That is to say, for those in the realm of investigative inquiry, where is the gain. That comes from the classical spectrum of criminology, dealing with victim, suspects and perpetrators.
In the business of selling one theory after another, particularly those of an extraterrestrial variety, there is exceptional profit potential. Capitalizing on ignorance, paranoia and primordial self-interests, provides lucrative remunerations for skillful entrepreneurs. Setting aside the vast array of conspiracy theories, the "alien agenda" attracts much interest by most people. From successful novels to television Sci-Fi portrayals, "ufology" is extraordinarily popular with huge segments of the population. In fact, much of what of the speculation about other worldly visitors comes from fictional sources. One could begin with early western space fiction in the late 19th century. Creative authors imagined fascinating cosmic adventures.
From there, any assessment of the profit potential in storytelling, as it relates to alien travelers, is likely a lot of guesswork. However, there is an illusion among some writers. For the author, regarding the potential for moneymaking from writing stories about science fiction and fantasy, the probability is enormous success is low. On the production side, for an assortment of individual and corporate media companies, the potential is slightly different. With the internet, as well as various competing streaming services, conspiracy theories abound in a variety of forms. According to one prominent financial news source, media services eagerly promote "conspiratorial concepts". If it sells, it does not matter what the evidence shows, or the scientific validation.
Accordingly, one traditional magazine put the estimate of "UFO believers" in the range of about two thirds of the American population. The likelihood of a higher correlation is probably a good assumption. Therefore, approximately three out of every four Americans accept the notion of alien lifeforms, with roughly one in three believing aliens have visited earth.
Given that belief systems vary, and motivations are diverse, one aspect that stands out permeates the social strata. Making a living from "UFO phenomena. One online blog suggests that not everyone profits, but some do very well. By writing books, gaining a following and grabbing international notoriety, along with media promotions, a few make the genre lucrative. In furthering the discussion concerning the "alien agenda", another aspect involves constructing a cosmos teaming with life everywhere. This notion, aside from any monetary advantages for one person or another, is a more fascinating temptation. One online science forum for instance mentioned the "Fermi Paradox". This suggest the contrast between the lack of scientific evidence and the probability of other life forms in the cosmic order. Where are the aliens?
Better yet, where is the data? In other words, what scientific hardcore validation produces the viability of proof beyond any doubt? Perhaps in post-modern America that is too extreme. Forget that nonsense about evidentiary criteria. Presently there appears a resurgence of not only anti-intellectualism, but also anti-science thinking. Mere speculation based on eyewitness testimony, as an example, is insufficient. Logically speaking, bias influences conclusions at every opportunity, while the observer influences his or her observations. Opinions, rumors, hearsay, and gossip offer nothing of consistent provable data to substantiate probabilities. As suggested by one scientist, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
As to science, here the inference is in favor of those areas such as astrophysics, astronomy, biology, chemistry, and physics to name a few. Often, some call this realm the "hard sciences". Meanwhile, in the alleged "soft sciences", or protestations of the pseudosciences, philosophies thrive in the areas of criminology, psychology, sociology and theology. While a few freely admit the sphere of the "social studies" areas are not hard sciences, others cringe, as they desperately want consideration as a "scientist". In that dominion, debates can rage as to whom is the most scientific, others can assess who cares. Regardless, evidence remains critical.
In the imaginative processes of thinking, many people are quite creative. So far, for a majority of alien adherents, the inventiveness of cosmic engineering designs a universe teeming with all kinds of life forms. With billions of possible habitats, why not? Unfortunately, again hard evidence does not suffice the near religious conviction of science fiction enthusiasts. In this reference, several researchers provide commentary for the assertion that alien aficionados pursue a "theological" conviction for advanced cosmic species. Elevated to a divine state of intergalactic supremacy, believers place humans in a subservient role to alien ascendancy.
For this discussion, the term "profit" is not limited to the monetary incentive alone. Instead, the application applies to any form of gain derived from promoting, advocating or otherwise proselytizing a cosmic or supernatural perspective. Notably, this doe not mean there is anything wrong with any belief system as an individualized personal point of view. At least for the time being, in America, everyone is entitled to her or his outlook. Alternatively, when "profitability" and intolerance for opposing perspectives enter the public arena, problems arise. Disputes and disagreements in communal discourse ought to allow for the reasonable engagement. All too often, in contemporary mainstream, dangerous condescension quickly devolves discussion.
Regardless, conspiracy theories of one form or another abound in great abundance, particularly in the allegedly "highly educated" U.S. population. Revisit that for a moment. Logical skepticism, reinforced by scientific and forensic analysis seems woefully deficient in the "postmodern" American framework. While some potentially maintain amazing brilliance in niche or domain subsets, areas of particular expertise, outside that, ignorance astounds the few. From alien DNA creating humans to 21st century "sociopolitical tribalism", many pursue a claim to fame. Fake news, scheming hoaxes and all manner of hucksterism manifest an array of con artistry.
In a devolving society, allowing that supposition for the moment, not much in terms of intellectual advancement has a high probability of exception. The vast stretches to global ramifications further the conceptualization of an intellectually eroding population. As to the opportunistic possibilities, criminals of every sort take advantage of targets of opportunity. Social media is rife with foolish pretentiousness of "tubular selfie-isms". By "tubular", the verbiage intends reference to those who feel the need to exhibit themselves in a podcast recreation of them. For "them", metaphorically inferring an alternative form of self-centeredness.
A tube, a podcast, a video channel in some streaming service boasts the superficially of limited knowledge and understanding of the mysteriousness surrounding the world. Not to forget of course, the nature of exceptionality. Yet, exceptions to a notion of rampant social media foolishness, and the spread of erroneous commentary, is a small percentage. At critical junctures of communal battles for truth versus fiction, where facts become annoying distractions, desired needs for self-validation rage rampantly. Mental conflicts struggle against the realization that growing up and developing mature self-evolving transition requires extraordinary discipline. For most people, adolescence embraces the cowardice of refusing to transform. Personal liberation in every aspect of individual ideation is a frightening prospect for nearly everyone.
Again, exceptionality applies. Disengagement from the status quo, the contrived consensus and the enforced normality, is psychically rebellious and invites retaliation. Whatever is defined as "normal" depends on the range of communal acceptance. At any given time, resistance is not futile in the sense that acceptance of consequences is understood. Yet, many cowards creep the landscape of social interactivity. From selfie neediness in self-promoting "tube shows", to pretentious pontifications of "opining blogs", the ruse of anti-science faux intellectualism fogs the atmosphere of social discourse. Foolishness abounds with rabid proliferation via superficial mimicry in the excessive use of techno gadgetry. Ignorance in self-importance wears many disguises.
In echoes of the past, an assertion that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, for most that is quickly overshadowed by retaliatory invective. In response to a probable rational inquiry, hunting for the evidentiary validation, many will do little to expand, enhance or otherwise enrich their innate abilities beyond the pseudo-intellectual babble of social media. For none of those with the power to exemplify an enlightened ascendency will demonstrate exceptionality of honorable personality. Its too personal, much material gain or psychic fame profane any inclination to the bravery of differentiation. Selfishness is far too critical an essential necessity for many, if not most often the attendant example. The blasphemy of stupidity spreads everywhere.
You must be logged in to post a comment.