The highest 5G frequency is currently my V-band experience at 48 GHz. It is part of the fr-2 5G spectrum, due to its wavelength mm. Very high frequency.
So what's higher in frequency than in our electromagnetic spectrum?
What about infrared? Does infrared absorb oxygen from us?
What about the next sibling high, visible light? Do you get air out of you every morning when you look out your window?
Maybe if you live in a beautiful green place like me. But that is simply a matter of my appreciation of life, not of the visible light that illuminates everything I swallow.
What about my next big brother, UV rays? Do you suffer from exhaustion when you go out with friends playing laser tag on the weekends?
That was over me. You probably do. But it is because you are not using your heart enough, so you easily get tired. There is no UV contact inside the room.
I hope you can sleep easily now ...
EOops, love the ongoing debate here on wether 5G is really bad for us. I want to start by saying that I am a big fan of fair, respectful, honest debates - which I see crossing the line in some of these terms - and I want to make it clear that irrational comments that do not make sense do not fall on anyone. However, I want to present my argument on both sides.
For someone who says energy goes down as fast as you are close to a well, and then literally as you move away - it really is. See the free space loss equation equation if you don't believe it.
For someone who says that voice flexibility is important - I have to disagree. Voice fluency at the basic level means where your 1 and where 0 is "at the time." The ultimate goal of flexibility is to be able to change data output in a way that logically minimizes errors based on the signal quality you receive - see 4qam vs 64qam as an example. You make 64qam if you have a little noise, you can maximize efficiency. So more data means 1 and 0's more - 64 qam means that each "mark" has 16 bits. But what is important for a person to be injured is not how many 1s and 0 ′s pass, but how much force they pass through, as also, one might argue, the average energy value (more 0 or more 1's)
So one thing that is not true that I have failed to mention is power. How much energy is exported? If I put my head in the microwave is it dangerous? Definitely, of course. Are those RF waves? Definitely. The argument can therefore be rightly attributed to the essential power of the argument.
Depending on your source, you will hear very different amounts of energy used by the basic channels. I will use the high rating taken from Huawei as an example here:
According to Huawei data on RRU / BBU requirements per site, a typical 5G site has a power requirement of more than 11.5 kilowatts, an increase of about 70% from the base station transmitting 2G, 3G and 4G radio transmissions .
Thus 11.5 KW. I know there is a good value going on here, so for the sake of argument I will have to make irrational, but fair measurements, here. Basic channels are divided into 3 categories, so 11.5 kw / 3 = 3.83 KW per sector (120 degrees, total or 360 degrees spread). Due to cooling requirements, as well as efficiency, you can cut off the energy used to actually be 30-40% of that. Let's say about 40%, we give 1.53 KW. Now, as you may know, horns are not pinned down, but horizontally. In addition, the phase antennas are arranged in phases so that they do not emit too much energy on the ground nearby. So let’s go back to the guy who said the power is really strong near you, and it goes down fast. The truth is.
I want to first explain the concept of bricklayers who are not familiar with those who say to me "1.53 kw at 120 degrees sounds very dangerous." The concept is to emit EM rays. Is 1.53 kw dangerous when you are on the phone and touch it? Most likely. Is it harmful to the air? The antenna engineer will ask you, what is its medium-term power, which is the amount of power it strikes. This power outage time should be determined by the minimum power tower - by the power station controller. You see, one of the main reasons the friis equation says power decreases significantly in small distances is because when you look at the rate of change of the surface of the circle (power distribution) your surface area is very large. (power per square meter is distributed very quickly) at the beginning. Going forward, as anyone who has taken the basic horn study well knows, the distribution is actually more like a wave wave rather than a circular spread, which is closely related to the logarithmic decrease in each square meter.
.
You must be logged in to post a comment.