In short format, Dhoni did well but, he failed in long format, especially in foreign condition, but In long format, Khoil did well but, he failed in short format, especially in ICC tournaments.
Both players batting average is very well during the captain responsibility, that refers they have no captaincy pressure to impact their batting skills.
Dhoni handle all the situation with cool reactions, on the other hand Khoil is an aggressive captain that makes the situation good as well as bad for sometimes duration the pressure matches.
Khoil helps many times as a batsman for India's must win matches and chasing also he score many runs to get target for Indian team under Dhoni captaincy, but no players were performed as well as Khoil under his captaincy, especially to win such a big tournament matches.
During Dhoni captaincy, all the other teams have strong players that was very difficult to win matches against them but that time Dhoni plays a crucial role for team India to beat all best team around the world that makes him best captain in cricket history.
Khoil had a huge burden that to take the legacy of Indian team after Dhoni captaincy that he produced some extraordinary ICC tournaments victories.
Khoil have a fixed game plan that follows all from the starting of the match to end, he always believed himself and he depends only on the player's performance, he never did some brilliant moves that will change the entire game towards wining moments in difficult situation of the matches.
In all matches under Dhoni captaincy, if team India wins the match that credit goes to him, when results went wrong also he takes the blame for the loss, so the responsibility totally depends on one man shoulder.
You must be logged in to post a comment.