Breaking Down the One Step Challenge and 2 Step Evaluation: What Prop Firm Traders Need to Know

Prop firms have revolutionized the trading landscape, offering traders access to funded accounts without requiring personal capital. However, gaining access to these funds involves completing a proprietary firm's evaluation process. Two common models used are the One Step Challenge Prop Firm and the 2 Step Evaluation model. Each has its own benefits and challenges, and understanding these differences is crucial for traders seeking the best funding route.

Understanding Prop Firm Evaluations

Proprietary trading firms offer traders a chance to trade with firm capital rather than their own money. In return, traders share a portion of their profits with the firm. To determine who qualifies for this opportunity, firms use evaluation challenges, primarily categorized as:

  • One Step Challenge

  • 2 Step Evaluation

Each evaluation structure tests a trader’s ability to meet profit targets while adhering to risk management rules.

What is the One Step Challenge Prop Firm Model?

The One Step Challenge model simplifies the process by requiring traders to complete just one stage of evaluation before receiving a funded account. Some of its key features include:

Key Features of One Step Challenge

  1. Single Evaluation Phase – Traders must hit profit targets in one round of trading.

  2. Faster Funding – Since there’s only one phase, traders can get access to funded accounts much quicker.

  3. Strict Risk Management – Risk rules are often tighter to compensate for the shorter evaluation.

  4. High Fees but Quicker Returns – Some firms charge higher challenge fees but provide faster opportunities to trade live capital.

Pros of One Step Challenge

  • Speed – Traders can access funding much faster than with a 2 Step Evaluation.

  • Simple Structure – No need to go through multiple rounds of trading.

  • Immediate Profit Sharing – Some firms allow traders to start withdrawing profits right away.

Cons of One Step Challenge

  • Higher Risk – No second chance if traders fail to meet the objectives.

  • Stricter Drawdown Rules – Since the firm takes on more risk, traders may have to operate under tighter loss limits.

What is the 2 Step Evaluation Model?

The 2 Step Evaluation is the traditional model used by most prop firms. It consists of two phases where traders must prove their consistency over an extended period.

Key Features of 2 Step Evaluation

  1. Two-Phase Verification – Traders must successfully complete two phases before getting funded.

  2. More Lenient Risk Rules – Compared to the One Step Challenge, traders often get slightly relaxed drawdown limits.

  3. Lower Initial Costs – Many firms offer lower challenge fees due to the two-step verification reducing risk.

  4. Higher Profit Targets – Since traders have to complete two stages, the profit target is often higher across both phases.

Pros of 2 Step Evaluation

  • More Forgiving – If a trader fails in the first step, they can sometimes get a retry.

  • Lower Risk for the Trader – Less immediate pressure to perform in a single challenge phase.

  • Higher Trust from Firms – Prop firms feel more secure funding traders who pass both stages.

Cons of 2 Step Evaluation

  • Longer Process – Takes more time to secure a funded account.

  • Potential for Inconsistency – Traders need to maintain performance over two separate evaluation phases.

Comparing One Step Challenge and 2 Step Evaluation

Feature One Step Challenge 2 Step Evaluation
Speed of Funding Fast Slower
Risk Management Stricter More lenient
Profit Targets Moderate Higher overall
Evaluation Cost Higher upfront Lower initially
Trader Retakes Fewer chances More flexibility

Choosing the Best Model for Your Trading Style

Deciding between a One Step Challenge and a 2 Step Evaluation depends on your trading style and objectives:

  • For Aggressive Traders: One Step Challenges offer a faster route to funding but require discipline.

  • For Consistent Traders: The 2 Step Evaluation allows traders to prove consistency over time, which may be a safer bet for long-term success.

  • For Scalpers and Day Traders: One Step Challenges may be preferable due to the quick turnaround.

  • For Swing Traders: 2 Step Evaluations provide a more measured approach with relaxed risk rules.

Popular Prop Firms Offering One Step and 2 Step Evaluations

Several proprietary trading firms provide both evaluation models. Here are some of the best:

Best Prop Firms for One Step Challenge

  1. FunderPro – Offers rapid funding and relaxed profit targets.

  2. Maven Trading – Well-suited for aggressive traders looking for quick access to capital.

  3. MyFundedFX – Provides instant funding after passing a single challenge.

Best Prop Firms for 2 Step Evaluation

  1. FTMO – One of the most reputable firms offering structured two-step challenges.

  2. The Funded Trader – Provides various account types with flexible evaluation rules.

  3. MFF (My Forex Funds) – A leading firm offering balanced risk and profit-sharing options.

Conclusion: Which Evaluation Model is Right for You?

Both the One Step Challenge and 2 Step Evaluation serve different purposes, catering to different trading styles and risk tolerances. If you are confident in your ability to meet profit targets quickly, the One Step Challenge may be the best option. On the other hand, if you prefer a structured approach that allows more time to showcase consistency, then the 2 Step Evaluation could be the better choice.

Enjoyed this article? Stay informed by joining our newsletter!

Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment.

About Author